Literature DB >> 15118637

A comparison of anticipatory and postprocedure pain perception in patients who undergo urodynamic procedures.

R Mark Ellerkmann1, Andrew W McBride, James S Dunn, Alfred E Bent, Joan L Blomquist, Lorrel G Kummer, Clifford F Melick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare anticipatory and postprocedure pain perception in female patients who undergo multichannel urodynamic evaluation in an office setting. STUDY
DESIGN: One hundred consecutive patients completed a visual analogue pain scale before and after urodynamic testing.
RESULTS: The mean postprocedure pain score of 2.32 cm was significantly lower than the anticipatory pain rating of 4.35 cm (P<.05). The lower postprocedure pain score was not influenced by previous hysterectomy, body mass index, menopausal status, estrogen replacement therapy, or analgesic or psychiatric medication usage. Patients who had undergone previous anti-incontinence surgery reported significantly higher levels of pain during the procedure (mean visual analogue pain scale score, 3.10 cm vs 2.06 cm; P=.027).
CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo urodynamic testing anticipate higher degrees of discomfort than they perceive during the procedure. Previous anti-incontinence surgery appears to lower the pain threshold.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15118637     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of anxiety, pain, and embarrassment associated with cystoscopy and urodynamic testing in clinical practice.

Authors:  Xavier Biardeau; Ornella Lam; Van Ba; Lysanne Campeau; Jacques Corcos
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  A Telephone Call to Decrease Patient Anxiety Before Urodynamic Testing: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Hussein Warda; Michele R Hacker; Miriam J Haviland; Lekha S Hota
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.091

3.  Repeatability of Ultrasound-Defined Bladder Shape Metrics in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Kaitlyn M Maddra; Rui Li; Anna S Nagle; Adam P Klausner; John E Speich
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Randomized controlled trial of 2% lidocaine gel versus water-based lubricant for multi-channel urodynamics.

Authors:  Begüm Z Özel; Vanessa Sun; Avita Pahwa; Rebecca Nelken; Christina E Dancz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Comparison of 2D and 3D ultrasound methods to measure serial bladder volumes during filling: Steps toward development of non-invasive ultrasound urodynamics.

Authors:  Anna S Nagle; Rachel J Bernardo; Jary Varghese; Laura R Carucci; Adam P Klausner; John E Speich
Journal:  Bladder (San Franc)       Date:  2018-01-04

6.  Predictors for De Novo Overactive Bladder after Readjustable Mid-Urethral Sling Procedure in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence due to Intrinsic Sphincter Deficiency.

Authors:  Joo Hyun No; Kyung Hwa Choi; Dae Keun Kim; Tae Heon Kim; Seung Ryeol Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.