Literature DB >> 15118628

Continent ileocolonic urinary reservoir (Miami pouch): the University of Miami experience over 15 years.

Emery M Salom1, Luis E Mendez, Dana Schey, Nicholas Lambrou, Noor Kassira, Orlando Gómez-Marn, Hervy Averette, Manuel Peñalver.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A patient with a recurrent central pelvic malignancy after radiation will require urinary diversion as part of the reconstructive phase of the pelvic exenteration. The aim of our study was to assess the result of our 15-year experience with a continent ileocolonic urinary reservoir, which is known as the Miami pouch. STUDY
DESIGN: Since 1988, all patients who received a continent ileocolonic urinary reservoir in the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Miami School of Medicine, were included in the study. Parameters that were evaluated during the study period include functional outcomes, early and late perioperative complications, and their treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were identified from February 1988 to December 2002. Seventy-eight patients (87%) had a recurrent central pelvic malignancy, and 82 patients (91%) received radiation before the Miami pouch procedure. The non-reservoir-related morbidities were fever (76%), wound complication (30%), pelvic collection (12%), ileus/small bowel obstruction (12%), and postoperative death (11%). The most common reservoir-related complications were urinary infection (40%), ureteral stricture (20%), and difficulty with self-catheterization (18%). In our study, the overall complication rate that was related directly to the Miami pouch was 53%. Conservative treatment resolved>80% of these cases. The rate of urinary continence that was achieved in our patients was 93% during our 15-year experience with the Miami pouch.
CONCLUSION: The Miami pouch is a good alternative for continent urinary diversion during exenteration or radiation-induced damage. The rate of major complications that require aggressive surgical intervention is acceptable. Most postoperative complications (80%) can be corrected with the use of conservative techniques that are associated with fewer deaths than reoperation and thus should be used first. The technique is simple and effective in women who are at high risk, who have undergone previous radiation therapy, and who have a high rate of functional success and is a profound advantage for a woman's psychosocial well-being.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15118628     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Which operation is described?

Authors:  Radek Chvatal; Dietmar Haas; Cemil Yaman; Peter Oppelt
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-06-01

2.  Pelvic exenteration in gynecologic oncology: a single institution study over 20 years.

Authors:  T Benn; R A Brooks; Q Zhang; M A Powell; P H Thaker; D G Mutch; I Zighelboim
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Stem cell applications for pathologies of the urinary bladder.

Authors:  Noha A Mousa; Hisham A Abou-Taleb; Hazem Orabi
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 5.326

4.  Outcomes of right colon continent urinary pouch using standardized reporting methods.

Authors:  Jeremy B Myers; Christopher Martin; Philip J Cheng; Chong Zhang; Angela P Presson
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Continent cutaneous urinary diversion with an ileal pouch with the Mitrofanoff principle versus a Miami pouch in patients undergoing cystectomy for bladder cancer: results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Maxime Pattou; Michael Baboudjian; Ugo Pinar; Jérôme Parra; Morgan Rouprêt; Gilles Karsenty; Véronique Phe
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Postoperative outcomes after continent versus incontinent urinary diversion at the time of pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Anze Urh; Pamela T Soliman; Kathleen M Schmeler; Shannon Westin; Michael Frumovitz; Alpa M Nick; Bryan Fellman; Diana L Urbauer; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Treatment options in recurrent cervical cancer (Review).

Authors:  Angiolo Gadducci; Roberta Tana; Stefania Cosio; Luca Cionini
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 8.  Urinary diversion after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Carlos Martínez-Gómez; Martina Aida Angeles; Alejandra Martinez; Bernard Malavaud; Gwenael Ferron
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.437

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.