Literature DB >> 1511811

Prospective evaluation of complications in an endoscopy unit: use of the A/S/G/E quality care guidelines.

D E Fleischer1, F al-Kawas, S Benjamin, J H Lewis, J Kidwell.   

Abstract

In 1989, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy released a quality assurance monograph in which a procedure review process was outlined. The major elements of the program for quality assurance in gastrointestinal endoscopy included: (1) procedure reports, (2) an endoscopic unit record, and (3) a procedure review. This study was designed to use the procedure review process to determine the incidence of complications, to identify quality assurance issues, and to determine whether audits and/or studies would result from this process. To make a meaningful interpretation as to what constitutes an important complication, a classification to define potential problems was established. Using this classification, a complication was identified in 64 of 3287 procedures (1.9%). These complications were discussed in a monthly morbidity and mortality conference. Additionally, 21 quality assurance issues were identified that led to four studies addressing these quality assurance issues.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1511811     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(92)70466-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  4 in total

1.  Modification of the surgical morbidity and mortality meetings as a tool to improve patient safety.

Authors:  Ibrahim Abdulrasheed; Delia Ibrahim Zira; Asuku Malachy Eneye
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2011-07

2.  General considerations and updates in pediatric gastrointestinal diagnostic endoscopy.

Authors:  Yong Joo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pediatr       Date:  2010-09-13

3.  Endoscopy Following Pediatric Intestinal Transplant.

Authors:  Joanna Yeh; Khiet D Ngo; Laura J Wozniak; Jorge H Vargas; Elizabeth A Marcus; Sue V McDiarmid; Douglas G Farmer; Robert S Venick
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.839

4.  Peer evaluation and feedback for invasive medical procedures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Theresa Thai; Diana K N Louden; Rosemary Adamson; Jason A Dominitz; Jacob A Doll
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.263

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.