PURPOSE: Cisplatin and temozolomide (TMZ) are active in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), with different profiles of toxicity. A bid regimen of TMZ achieves a strong inhibition of O(6)-alkylguanine DNA-alkyl transferase (AGAT), and cisplatin reduces AGAT activity in vitro, suggesting a possible synergic interaction. The primary end point of the present multicenter phase II study was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (PFS-6); secondary end points included response, toxicity, and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with GBM who experienced disease recurrence or progression after surgery and standard radiotherapy were eligible. Chemotherapy cycles consisted of cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, TMZ 130 mg/m(2) bolus followed by nine doses of 70 mg/m(2) every 12 hours (total of 5 days) from day 2 every 4 weeks. In the absence of hematologic toxicity, TMZ was escalated to 1,000 mg/m(2) in 5 days. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients (median age, 53.4 years; range, 27 to 70 years; median Karnofsky performance status, 80; range, 60 to 100) were accrued in the study. PFS-6 was 34% (95% CI, 23% to 50%), and PFS-12 was 4% (95% CI, 0.3% to 16%). Median PFS was 18.4 weeks (95% CI, 13 to 25.9 weeks). Among 49 assessable patients, one complete response and nine partial responses were obtained, with an overall response rate of 20.4% (95% CI, 7.7% to 33%). Among 203 treatment cycles delivered, the most common grade 3 or grade 4 events included granulocytopenia in 7.9% of cycles, thrombocytopenia in 4%, and neurologic toxicity in three patients (6%). CONCLUSION: The new cisplatin plus bid TMZ regimen appears active in chemotherapy-naive patients with recurrent GBM and incurs an acceptable toxicity.
PURPOSE:Cisplatin and temozolomide (TMZ) are active in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), with different profiles of toxicity. A bid regimen of TMZ achieves a strong inhibition of O(6)-alkylguanine DNA-alkyl transferase (AGAT), and cisplatin reduces AGAT activity in vitro, suggesting a possible synergic interaction. The primary end point of the present multicenter phase II study was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (PFS-6); secondary end points included response, toxicity, and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with GBM who experienced disease recurrence or progression after surgery and standard radiotherapy were eligible. Chemotherapy cycles consisted of cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, TMZ 130 mg/m(2) bolus followed by nine doses of 70 mg/m(2) every 12 hours (total of 5 days) from day 2 every 4 weeks. In the absence of hematologic toxicity, TMZ was escalated to 1,000 mg/m(2) in 5 days. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients (median age, 53.4 years; range, 27 to 70 years; median Karnofsky performance status, 80; range, 60 to 100) were accrued in the study. PFS-6 was 34% (95% CI, 23% to 50%), and PFS-12 was 4% (95% CI, 0.3% to 16%). Median PFS was 18.4 weeks (95% CI, 13 to 25.9 weeks). Among 49 assessable patients, one complete response and nine partial responses were obtained, with an overall response rate of 20.4% (95% CI, 7.7% to 33%). Among 203 treatment cycles delivered, the most common grade 3 or grade 4 events included granulocytopenia in 7.9% of cycles, thrombocytopenia in 4%, and neurologic toxicity in three patients (6%). CONCLUSION: The new cisplatin plus bid TMZ regimen appears active in chemotherapy-naive patients with recurrent GBM and incurs an acceptable toxicity.
Authors: Marco Hassler; Michael Micksche; Günther Stockhammer; Josef Pichler; Franz Payer; Brigitte Abuja; Robert Deinsberger; Christine Marosi Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: G Minniti; V Armosini; M Salvati; G Lanzetta; P Caporello; M Mei; M F Osti; R Enrici Maurizi Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2010-11-05 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Jai Woong Seo; JooChuan Ang; Lisa M Mahakian; Sarah Tam; Brett Fite; Elizabeth S Ingham; Janine Beyer; John Forsayeth; Krystof S Bankiewicz; Ting Xu; Katherine W Ferrara Journal: J Control Release Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: J C Easaw; W P Mason; J Perry; N Laperrière; D D Eisenstat; R Del Maestro; K Bélanger; D Fulton; D Macdonald Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Laia Capdevila; Sara Cros; Jose-Luis Ramirez; Carolina Sanz; Cristina Carrato; Margarita Romeo; Olatz Etxaniz; Cristina Hostalot; Ana Massuet; Jose Luis Cuadra; Salvador Villà; Carmen Balañà Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-01-07 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Darren Hargrave; Birgit Geoerger; Didier Frappaz; Torsten Pietsch; Lyle Gesner; Laura Cisar; Aurora Breazna; Andrew Dorman; Ofelia Cruz-Martinez; Jose Luis Fuster; Xavier Rialland; Céline Icher; Pierre Leblond; David Ashley; Giorgio Perilongo; Martin Elliott; Martin English; Niels Clausen; Jacques Grill Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 4.130