Literature DB >> 15117935

Selection for high-level resistance by chronic triclosan exposure is not universal.

Andrew J McBain1, Ruth G Ledder, Prem Sreenivasan, Peter Gilbert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of triclosan exposure on the antimicrobial susceptibilities of numerically important dental bacteria.
METHODS: A gradient plate technique was used to expose Fusobacterium nucleatum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Neisseria subflava, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Actinomyces naeslundii, Prevotella nigrescens, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus sanguis, Streptococcus mutans and Veillonella dispar repeatedly to escalating, sublethal concentrations of triclosan. Escherichia coli ATCC 8739 was included as an organism showing the triclosan resistance development trait. MIC values towards chlorhexidine, metronidazole and tetracycline were determined before and after biocide exposure.
RESULTS: N. subflava, Pr. nigrescens Po. gingivalis and E. coli were highly susceptible to triclosan (MIC range 0.1-3.9 mg/L), whereas the lactobacillus and S. mutans were less susceptible (MIC range 15.6-20.8 mg/L). Triclosan exposure resulted in a highly significant ( approximately 400-fold) reduction in triclosan susceptibility (P < 0.01) for the positive control E. coli, although its MICs towards chlorhexidine, metronidazole and tetracycline were not significantly altered. Minor ( approximately two-fold) decreases in triclosan susceptibility (MIC) occurred for Pr. nigrescens and in S. sanguis and S. oralis (MBC). Mean changes in susceptibilities (MIC and MBC) of the oral species to chlorhexidine, metronidazole and tetracycline did not exceed two-fold, although chlorhexidine MBCs for S. sanguis were markedly, but transiently, increased.
CONCLUSIONS: These data fail to demonstrate biologically significant drug resistance in triclosan-exposed bacteria and suggest that markedly decreased triclosan susceptibility, although confirmed for E. coli, is not a universal phenomenon. Other bacteria possibly possess more susceptible targets than FabI that are highly conserved, which may govern triclosan activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15117935     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkh168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  19 in total

1.  Antibacterial activity of a triclosan-containing resin composite matrix against three common oral bacteria.

Authors:  Andreas Rathke; Rainer Staude; Rainer Muche; Bernd Haller
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Antimicrobial activity Study of triclosan-loaded WBPU on Proteus mirabilis in vitro.

Authors:  Ye Tian; Zhongyu Jian; Jianzhong Wang; Wei He; Qinyu Liu; Kunjie Wang; Hong Li; Hong Tan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Variable Effects of Exposure to Formulated Microbicides on Antibiotic Susceptibility in Firmicutes and Proteobacteria.

Authors:  Sarah Forbes; Christopher G Knight; Nicola L Cowley; Alejandro Amézquita; Peter McClure; Gavin Humphreys; Andrew J McBain
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Attenuated virulence and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus following sublethal exposure to triclosan.

Authors:  Joe Latimer; Sarah Forbes; Andrew J McBain
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Antimicrobial sutures and prevention of surgical site infection: assessment of the safety of the antiseptic triclosan.

Authors:  David Leaper; Ojan Assadian; Nils-Olaf Hubner; Andrew McBain; Thomas Barbolt; Stephen Rothenburger; Peter Wilson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  BrpA is involved in regulation of cell envelope stress responses in Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  J P Bitoun; S Liao; X Yao; S-J Ahn; R Isoda; A H Nguyen; L J Brady; R A Burne; J Abranches; Z T Wen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Psr is involved in regulation of glucan production, and double deficiency of BrpA and Psr is lethal in Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Jacob P Bitoun; Sumei Liao; Briggs A McKey; Xin Yao; Yuwei Fan; Jacqueline Abranches; Wandy L Beatty; Zezhang T Wen
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.777

8.  Bacteriological effects of dentifrices with and without active ingredients of natural origin.

Authors:  Ruth G Ledder; Joe Latimer; Gavin J Humphreys; Prem K Sreenivasan; Andrew J McBain
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  In vitro study of the effect of cationic biocides on bacterial population dynamics and susceptibility.

Authors:  Louise E Moore; Ruth G Ledder; Peter Gilbert; Andrew J McBain
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  The LiaFSR system regulates the cell envelope stress response in Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Prashanth Suntharalingam; M D Senadheera; Richard W Mair; Céline M Lévesque; Dennis G Cvitkovitch
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.