Literature DB >> 15117664

The effect of perceived locomotor constraints on distance estimation.

J T Corlett1, W Byblow, B Taylor.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to examine the ways in which the visual estimation of distance to a target is affected by constraints perceived to be placed on the subsequent locomotion to the target without vision. We hypothesized that an appraisal of impending effort would play a role in ascertaining the distance to be walked. In Experiment 1, the amount of resistance to walking was variable and unpredictable. One group of subjects performed against relatively low resistance, whereas another group performed against substantially greater resistance. In the low-resistance condition, no significant differences in CE, VE, time to target, or number of steps to target were found between any of the eight combinations of predictable or unpredictable resistances during walking. In the high-resistance condition, however, significant differences were found for CE and number of strides to target when resistance varied unpredictably during walking. Experiment 2 was similar in design but required subjects to walk with combinations of normal or short steps after they had viewed the target knowing only the gait type that would be used to begin locomotion. No differences in CE, VE, or time to target were found between four different combinations of gait type and predictability, under subjectively controlled conditions. When the step constraints were externally imposed, however, differences were found for CE. None of the results from either experiment, in which the number of strides needed to reach the target or the predictability of gait did not change from normal, supported the hypothesis that motor output requirements are necessary in forming a mental representation of the target position that can be used to walk to the target with eyes closed. Whichever locomotor technique was used to walk the estimated distance in these cases, the representation was able to be used independently. When walking mechanics were altered by externally imposed constraints, however, the success at reaching the estimated target position was reduced. These latter results are consistent with those obtained using up, down, and level walking and support the premise that mental representations used in blind walking are linked to the locomotor mechanics afforded by environmental conditions.

Year:  1990        PMID: 15117664     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1990.10735518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  6 in total

1.  Interrelations between the perception of time and space in large-scale environments.

Authors:  Martin Riemer; Rupert Hölzl; Dieter Kleinböhl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Goal-directed linear locomotion in normal and labyrinthine-defective subjects.

Authors:  S Glasauer; M A Amorim; E Vitte; A Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Does who I am and what I feel determine what I see (or say)? A meta-analytic systematic review exploring the influence of real and perceived bodily state on spatial perception of the external environment.

Authors:  Erin MacIntyre; Felicity A Braithwaite; Brendan Mouatt; Dianne Wilson; Tasha R Stanton
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.061

4.  The various perceptions of distance: an alternative view of how effort affects distance judgments.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; John W Philbeck; Jerome V Danoff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Action-specific influences on perception and postperceptual processes: Present controversies and future directions.

Authors:  John W Philbeck; Jessica K Witt
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Using a stick does not necessarily alter judged distances or reachability.

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.