Literature DB >> 15116991

Hemispheric performance in object-based attention.

Monica A Valsangkar-Smyth1, Christa-Lynn Donovan, Scott Sinnett, Michael R W Dawson, Alan Kingstone.   

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to investigate whether object-based attention effects differ across the cerebral hemispheres. Previous research has suggested that object-based attention is preferentially lateralized to the left hemisphere (Egly, Driver, & Rafal, 1994; Egly, Rafal, Driver, & Starrveveld, 1994). However, work by Vecera (1994) has suggested that these previous studies may have failed to obtain a pure measure of object-based attention. The present study applied modified versions of Duncan's (1984) seminal object-based attention paradigm. Subjects were typically presented with one target object to a single visual field (one-object display), two target objects to the same visual field (two-object unilateral display), or two target objects to different visual fields (two-object bilateral display). In all three experiments, response accuracy was higher for the one-object displays than for the two-object displays. Most important, this object-based cost was especially severe when selection of two target elements was isolated to the right visual field (left hemisphere). We confirmed that this effect was specific to object-based attention in three different ways: Experiment 1 manipulated stimulus distance, as recommended by Vecera; Experiment 2 ensured that target selection was based on nonspatial attributes; and Experiment 3 used overlapping displays, as in Duncan (1984). Collectively, the data are in accord with previous conclusions that object-based attention is a specialized form of orienting subserved by lateralized cortical brain mechanisms. However, contrary to previous research, it appears that it is the right hemisphere, and not the left hemisphere, that is preferentially biased for committing object-based attention to elements in the visual environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15116991     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  9 in total

1.  Competition-induced visual field differences in search.

Authors:  J H Fecteau; J T Enns; A Kingstone
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

2.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-12

3.  Visual and verbal coding in the interhemispheric transfer of information.

Authors:  R Davis; V Schmit
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1973-08

4.  Visual attention and objects: evidence for hierarchical coding of location.

Authors:  G C Baylis; J Driver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects.

Authors:  R Egly; J Driver; R D Rafal
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1994-06

6.  Does visual attention select objects or locations?

Authors:  S P Vecera; M J Farah
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1994-06

7.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

9.  Coordination of what and where in visual attention.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Role of the lateral prefrontal cortex in visual object-based selective attention.

Authors:  Scott Sinnett; Janice J Snyder; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The role of the parietal lobe in visual extinction studied with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Lorella Battelli; George A Alvarez; Thomas Carlson; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Prism adaptation does not alter object-based attention in healthy participants.

Authors:  Janet H Bultitude; Alexandra List; Anne M Aimola Davies
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-11-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.