Literature DB >> 15116843

Fate of elemental mercury in the Arctic during atmospheric mercury depletion episodes and the load of atmospheric mercury to the Arctic.

Henrik Skov1, Jesper H Christensen, Michael E Goodsite, Niels Z Heidam, Bjarne Jensen, Peter Wåhlin, Gerald Geernaert.   

Abstract

Atmospheric mercury depletion episodes (AMDEs) were studied at Station Nord, Northeast Greenland, 81 degrees 36' N, 16 degrees 40' W, during the Arctic Spring. Gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) and ozone were measured starting from 1998 and 1999, respectively, until August 2002. GEM was measured with a TEKRAN 2735A automatic mercury analyzer based on preconcentration of mercury on a gold trap followed by detection using fluorescence spectroscopy. Ozone was measured by UV absorption. A scatter plot of GEM and ozone concentrations confirmed that also at Station Nord GEM and ozone are linearly correlated during AMDEs. The relationship between ozone and GEM is further investigated in this paper using basic reaction kinetics (i.e., Cl, ClO, Br, and BrO have been suggested as reactants for GEM). The analyses in this paper show that GEM in the Arctic troposphere most probably reacts with Br. On the basis of the experimental results of this paper and results from the literature, a simple parametrization for AMDE was included into the Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model (DEHM). In the model, GEM is converted linearly to reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) over sea ice with temperature below -4 degrees C with a lifetime of 3 or 10 h. The new AMDE parametrization was used together with the general parametrization of mercury chemistry [Petersen, G.; Munthe, J.; Pleijel, K.; Bloxam, R.; Vinod Kumar, A. Atmos. Environ. 1998, 32, 829-843]. The obtained model results were compared with measurements of GEM at Station Nord. There was good agreement between the start and general features periods with AMDEs, although the model could not reproduce the fast concentration changes, and the correlation between modeled and measured values decreased from 2000 to 2001 and further in 2002. The modeled RGM concentrations over the Arctic in 2000 were found to agree well with the temporal and geographical variability of the boundary column of monthly average BrO observed by the GOME satellite. Scenario calculations were performed with and without AMDEs. For the area north of the Polar Circle, the mercury deposition increases from 89 tons/year for calculations without an AMDE to 208 tons/year with the AMDE. The 208 tons/year represent an upper limit for the mercury load to the Artic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15116843     DOI: 10.1021/es030080h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  11 in total

1.  How water affects mercury-halogen interaction in the atmosphere.

Authors:  Tetiana Zubatiuk; Glake Hill; Jerzy Leszczynski
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Analysis of mercury and other heavy metals accumulated in lichen Usnea antarctica from James Ross Island, Antarctica.

Authors:  Ondřej Zvěřina; Kamil Láska; Rostislav Cervenka; Jan Kuta; Pavel Coufalík; Josef Komárek
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Variations in the isotopic composition of stable mercury isotopes in typical mangrove plants of the Jiulong estuary, SE China.

Authors:  Lumin Sun; Bingyan Lu; Dongxing Yuan; Wenbo Hao; Ying Zheng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Convective forcing of mercury and ozone in the Arctic boundary layer induced by leads in sea ice.

Authors:  Christopher W Moore; Daniel Obrist; Alexandra Steffen; Ralf M Staebler; Thomas A Douglas; Andreas Richter; Son V Nghiem
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Atmospheric mercury concentrations observed at ground-based monitoring sites globally distributed in the framework of the GMOS network.

Authors:  Francesca Sprovieri; Nicola Pirrone; Mariantonia Bencardino; Francesco D'Amore; Francesco Carbone; Sergio Cinnirella; Valentino Mannarino; Matthew Landis; Ralf Ebinghaus; Andreas Weigelt; Ernst-Günther Brunke; Casper Labuschagne; Lynwill Martin; John Munthe; Ingvar Wängberg; Paulo Artaxo; Fernando Morais; Henrique de Melo Jorge Barbosa; Joel Brito; Warren Cairns; Carlo Barbante; María Del Carmen Diéguez; Patricia Elizabeth Garcia; Aurélien Dommergue; Helene Angot; Olivier Magand; Henrik Skov; Milena Horvat; Jože Kotnik; Katie Alana Read; Luis Mendes Neves; Bernd Manfred Gawlik; Fabrizio Sena; Nikolay Mashyanov; Vladimir Obolkin; Dennis Wip; Xin Bin Feng; Hui Zhang; Xuewu Fu; Ramesh Ramachandran; Daniel Cossa; Joël Knoery; Nicolas Marusczak; Michelle Nerentorp; Claus Norstrom
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 6.133

6.  The Influence of Climate Change on Atmospheric Deposition of Mercury in the Arctic—A Model Sensitivity Study.

Authors:  Kaj M Hansen; Jesper H Christensen; Jørgen Brandt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Air Contamination by Mercury, Emissions and Transformations-a Review.

Authors:  Barbara Gworek; Wojciech Dmuchowski; Aneta H Baczewska; Paulina Brągoszewska; Olga Bemowska-Kałabun; Justyna Wrzosek-Jakubowska
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.520

8.  Gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) emissions from snow surfaces in northern New York.

Authors:  J Alexander Maxwell; Thomas M Holsen; Sumona Mondal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The dynamic arctic snow pack: an unexplored environment for microbial diversity and activity.

Authors:  Catherine Larose; Aurélien Dommergue; Timothy M Vogel
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2013-02-05

10.  Passive Sampling of Gaseous Elemental Mercury Based on a Composite TiO₂NP/AuNP Layer.

Authors:  Antonella Macagnano; Paolo Papa; Joshua Avossa; Viviana Perri; Marcello Marelli; Francesca Sprovieri; Emiliano Zampetti; Fabrizio De Cesare; Andrea Bearzotti; Nicola Pirrone
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-07       Impact factor: 5.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.