Literature DB >> 15116836

Receptor model comparisons and wind direction analyses of volatile organic compounds and submicrometer particles in an arid, binational, urban air shed.

Shaibal Mukerjee1, Gary A Norris, Luther A Smith, Christopher A Noble, Lucas M Neas, A Halûk Ozkaynak, Melissa Gonzales.   

Abstract

The relationship between continuous measurements of volatile organic compounds sources and particle number was evaluated at a Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Station Network (PAMS) site located near the U.S.-Mexico Border in central El Paso, TX. Sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were investigated using the multivariate receptor model UNMIX and the effective variance least squares receptor model known as Chemical Mass Balance (CMB, Version 8.0). As expected from PAMS measurements, overall findings from data screening as well as both receptor models confirmed that mobile sources were the major source of VOCs. Comparison of hourly source contribution estimates (SCEs) from the two receptor models revealed significant differences in motor vehicle exhaust and evaporative gasoline contributions. However, the motor vehicle exhaust contributions were highly correlated with each other. Motor vehicle exhaust was also correlated with the ultrafine and accumulation mode particle count, which suggests that motor vehicle exhaust is a source of these particles at the measurement site. Wind sector analyses were performed using the SCE and pollutant data to assess source location of VOCs, particle count, and criteria pollutants. Results from this study have application to source apportionment studies and mobile source emission control strategies that are ongoing in this air shed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15116836     DOI: 10.1021/es0304547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  UNMIX modeling of ambient PM(2.5) near an interstate highway in Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Authors:  Shaohua Hu; Rafael McDonald; Dainius Martuzevicius; Pratim Biswas; Sergey A Grinshpun; Anna Kelley; Tiina Reponen; James Lockey; Grace Lemasters
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Sources of submicron aerosol during fog-dominated wintertime at Kanpur.

Authors:  Tarun Gupta; Anil Mandariya
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Variability in childhood allergy and asthma across ethnicity, language, and residency duration in El Paso, Texas: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Erik R Svendsen; Melissa Gonzales; Mary Ross; Lucas M Neas
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 5.984

4.  Temporal-spatial analysis of U.S.-Mexico border environmental fine and coarse PM air sample extract activity in human bronchial epithelial cells.

Authors:  Fredine T Lauer; Leah A Mitchell; Edward Bedrick; Jacob D McDonald; Wen-Yee Lee; Wen-Whai Li; Hector Olvera; Maria A Amaya; Marianne Berwick; Melissa Gonzales; Robert Currey; Nicholas E Pingitore; Scott W Burchiel
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 5.  Analysis of benzene air quality standards, monitoring methods and concentrations in indoor and outdoor environment.

Authors:  Abinaya Sekar; George K Varghese; M K Ravi Varma
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-11-29

6.  UNMIX Methods Applied to Characterize Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds in Toronto, Ontario.

Authors:  Eugeniusz Porada; Mieczysław Szyszkowicz
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2016-06-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.