Literature DB >> 15116602

Evaluation of the unstable total hip arthroplasty.

William G Hamilton1, James P McAuley.   

Abstract

Despite advances in total hip arthroplasty, dislocation persists as a troublesome complication for orthopaedic surgeons to manage, second only to prosthetic loosening as a cause of revision. Although this complication has received considerable attention, evaluation and treatment of the unstable total hip arthroplasty remain poorly understood. Therefore, it is important to evaluate such factors as underlying patient comorbidities, the direction of dislocation, soft-tissue tension, surgical technique, implant design, and component position. For recurrent hip instability, a careful history to determine the mechanism of dislocation is necessary, and a review of preoperative imaging studies can help clarify whether gross component malpositioning is present. Examination under anesthesia and intraoperative inspection are also important. Taking the hip through a full range of motion while directly visualizing the anatomy can help diagnose component-to-component impingement, inadequate offset soft-tissue tension, extra-articular impingement, and other possible contributing factors. Even when a seemingly obvious cause of dislocation, such as component malposition, is diagnosed, surgical results have been somewhat disappointing. Therefore, surgical planning should include all possible revision options, and the temptation to find the quick fix should be resisted. Patients should be extensively counseled regarding realistic expectations both before primary hip arthroplasty and in the face of a revision surgery for recurrent dislocations because long-term results are less than optimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15116602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Instr Course Lect        ISSN: 0065-6895


  5 in total

1.  Does dual-mobility cup geometry affect posterior horizontal dislocation distance?

Authors:  Christopher Heffernan; Samik Banerjee; Jim Nevelos; James Macintyre; Kimona Issa; David C Markel; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Acetabular anteversion with CT in supine, simulated standing, and sitting positions in a THA patient population.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Lazennec; Patrick Boyer; Michel Gorin; Yves Catonné; Marc Antoine Rousseau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Difference in trochanteric thickness between well-aligned and malaligned polished collarless stem.

Authors:  R Thangaraj; William Wilson-Theaker; A Kumar; J Oakley
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-10-24

4.  Main complications of hip arthroplasty: pictorial essay.

Authors:  Dair Jocely Enge Júnior; Adham do Amaral E Castro; Eduardo Kaiser Ururahy Nunes Fonseca; Eduardo Baptista; Michel Bayouth Padial; Laercio Alberto Rosemberg
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb

5.  The effect of posterior capsule repair in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaobo Sun; Xingyang Zhu; Yuqing Zeng; Haitao Zhang; Jianchun Zeng; Wenjun Feng; Jie Li; Yirong Zeng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.