Literature DB >> 15116348

GEE approaches to marginal regression models for medical diagnostic tests.

Peter Martus1, Andrea Stroux, Anselm M Jünemann, Matthias Korth, Jost B Jonas, Folkert K Horn, Andreas Ziegler.   

Abstract

The evaluation of a new medical diagnostic test may focus on two different scientific questions: (1). The new test may replace an existing one because of lower cost or higher validity. A related question would be the selection of the 'best' test(s) from a bundle of new or established measurements. (2). The new test may be used supplementary to other new or established procedures. In a recent publication, Leisenring and co-workers (Stat Med 1997; 16:1263-1281) developed a general marginal regression model for comparisons of diagnostic tests focussing on question (1). i.e. on the selection of the 'best' procedure. They applied the GEE approach of Liang and Zeger (Biometrika 1987; 73:13-22) to adjust for the correlation of data as a nuisance parameter. Using the general framework provided by Leisenring et al., we extend their approach and apply the GEE methodology to question (2). i.e. to the investigation of which of several diagnostic tests should be used supplementary to each other. We analyse data from a longitudinal study concerning pathogenesis, diagnosis and long-term course of the eye disease glaucoma. We find a dependence of the correlation structure of several diagnostic measurements on the severity of the disease. This result may be useful in clinical applications as regards the selection of subsets of diagnostic measurements in individual diagnostic processes but also in investigations concerning the relationship of the pathogenic process and the rationales of the different diagnostic procedures. Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15116348     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  4 in total

1.  Multi-stage transitional models with random effects and their application to the Einstein aging study.

Authors:  Changhong Song; Lynn Kuo; Carol A Derby; Richard B Lipton; Charles B Hall
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 2.207

2.  Diagnostic Performance of the ISNT Rule for Glaucoma Based on the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph.

Authors:  Errol Wei'en Chan; Jiemin Liao; Reuben Chao Ming Foo; Seng Chee Loon; Tin Aung; Tien Yin Wong; Ching-Yu Cheng
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Telbivudine and adefovir combination therapy for patients with chronic lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus infections.

Authors:  Ming-Tsung Lin; Yeh-Pin Chou; Tsung-Hui Hu; Hsien-Chung Yu; Yu-Chun Hsu; Ming-Chao Tsai; Po-Lin Tseng; Kuo-Chin Chang; Yi-Hao Yen; King-Wah Chiu
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.574

4.  Statistical models for quantifying diagnostic accuracy with multiple lesions per patient.

Authors:  Aeilko H Zwinderman; Afina S Glas; Patrick M Bossuyt; Jasper Florie; Shandra Bipat; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 5.899

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.