BACKGROUND: Urotensin II (UII) has been identified as a ligand for the orphan receptor GPR14 through which it elicits potent vasoconstriction in humans and non-human primates. The pulmonary vasculature is particularly sensitive; human UII (hUII) exhibits a potency 28 times that of endothelin (ET)-1 in isolated pulmonary arteries obtained from cynomolgus monkeys. However, hUII induced vasoconstriction in isolated human intralobar pulmonary arteries is variable, possibly as a result of location dependent differences in receptor density or because it is only uncovered by disease dependent endothelial dysfunction. METHODS: The vasoactivity of both hUII and gobi UII (gUII) in comparison with ET-1 and ET-3 was studied in isolated perfused lung preparations (n = 14) and isolated intralobar pulmonary arteries (n = 40, mean diameter 548 (27) microm) obtained from 17 men of mean (SE) age 67 (2) years and eight women of mean (SE) age 65 (3) years with a variety of vascular diseases. RESULTS: ET-1 (10 pM-100 nM) and ET-3 (10 pM-30 nM) elicited vasoconstriction in the lung preparations, inducing comparable increases in pulmonary arterial pressure of 24.8 (4.5) mm Hg and 14.5 (4.9) mm Hg, respectively, at 30 nM (p = 0.13). Similarly, ET-1 (10 pM-300 nM) and ET-3 (10 pM-100 nM) caused marked vasoconstriction in isolated pulmonary arteries, inducing maximal changes in tension of 4.36 (0.26) mN/mm and 1.54 (0.44) mN/mm, respectively, generating -logEC(50) values of 7.67 (0.04) M and 8.08 (0.07) M, respectively (both p<0.05). However, neither hUII nor gUII (both 10 pM-1 micro M) had any vasoactive effect in either preparation. CONCLUSION: UII does not induce vasoconstriction in isolated human pulmonary arterial or lung preparations and is therefore unlikely to be involved in the control of pulmonary vascular tone.
BACKGROUND:Urotensin II (UII) has been identified as a ligand for the orphan receptor GPR14 through which it elicits potent vasoconstriction in humans and non-human primates. The pulmonary vasculature is particularly sensitive; humanUII (hUII) exhibits a potency 28 times that of endothelin (ET)-1 in isolated pulmonary arteries obtained from cynomolgus monkeys. However, hUII induced vasoconstriction in isolated human intralobar pulmonary arteries is variable, possibly as a result of location dependent differences in receptor density or because it is only uncovered by disease dependent endothelial dysfunction. METHODS: The vasoactivity of both hUII and gobi UII (gUII) in comparison with ET-1 and ET-3 was studied in isolated perfused lung preparations (n = 14) and isolated intralobar pulmonary arteries (n = 40, mean diameter 548 (27) microm) obtained from 17 men of mean (SE) age 67 (2) years and eight women of mean (SE) age 65 (3) years with a variety of vascular diseases. RESULTS: ET-1 (10 pM-100 nM) and ET-3 (10 pM-30 nM) elicited vasoconstriction in the lung preparations, inducing comparable increases in pulmonary arterial pressure of 24.8 (4.5) mm Hg and 14.5 (4.9) mm Hg, respectively, at 30 nM (p = 0.13). Similarly, ET-1 (10 pM-300 nM) and ET-3 (10 pM-100 nM) caused marked vasoconstriction in isolated pulmonary arteries, inducing maximal changes in tension of 4.36 (0.26) mN/mm and 1.54 (0.44) mN/mm, respectively, generating -logEC(50) values of 7.67 (0.04) M and 8.08 (0.07) M, respectively (both p<0.05). However, neither hUII nor gUII (both 10 pM-1 micro M) had any vasoactive effect in either preparation. CONCLUSION:UII does not induce vasoconstriction in isolated humanpulmonary arterial or lung preparations and is therefore unlikely to be involved in the control of pulmonary vascular tone.
Authors: S A Douglas; A C Sulpizio; V Piercy; H M Sarau; R S Ames; N V Aiyar; E H Ohlstein; R N Willette Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: A Stirrat; M Gallagher; S A Douglas; E H Ohlstein; C Berry; A Kirk; M Richardson; M R MacLean Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: M R MacLean; D Alexander; A Stirrat; M Gallagher; S A Douglas; E H Ohlstein; I Morecroft; K Polland Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Q Liu; S S Pong; Z Zeng; Q Zhang; A D Howard; D L Williams; M Davidoff; R Wang; C P Austin; T P McDonald; C Bai; S R George; J F Evans; C T Caskey Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 1999-12-09 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: R S Ames; H M Sarau; J K Chambers; R N Willette; N V Aiyar; A M Romanic; C S Louden; J J Foley; C F Sauermelch; R W Coatney; Z Ao; J Disa; S D Holmes; J M Stadel; J D Martin; W S Liu; G I Glover; S Wilson; D E McNulty; C E Ellis; N A Elshourbagy; U Shabon; J J Trill; D W Hay; E H Ohlstein; D J Bergsma; S A Douglas Journal: Nature Date: 1999-09-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Eugen Brailoiu; Xiaohua Jiang; G Cristina Brailoiu; Jun Yang; Jaw Kang Chang; Hong Wang; Nae J Dun Journal: Peptides Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 3.750