Literature DB >> 15115734

Individual differences in error processing: a review and reanalysis of three event-related fMRI studies using the GO/NOGO task.

Robert Hester1, Catherine Fassbender, Hugh Garavan.   

Abstract

Three previous studies using the GO/NOGO task were examined to characterize the pattern of functional activation seen during error-related processing. The large sample size (n = 44) also allowed investigation of the influence of individual differences in age, sex, self-reported absentmindedness and reaction speed on the level of activation. Errors were seen to activate a network of regions including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA), bilateral insula, thalamus and right inferior parietal lobule. Split-half comparisons performed for each of the individual difference variables indicated greater ACC and pre-SMA activation for older subjects while slower responders showed greater activation in the parietal, lateral PFC, insula and ACC regions. Whereas males and females demonstrated equivalent levels of activation in both the ACC and insula, self-reported absentmindedness related to reduced activation in these regions. Our review of the current imaging literature on error-related activation indicates that, despite the use of a variety of other cognitive paradigms, the network of regions identified here is consistent with these previous studies, suggesting that these regions are critical to a 'general' error-related response. Furthermore, this response is, in part, influenced by individual differences in both demographic characteristics and behavioural performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15115734     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhh059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  109 in total

1.  Functional parcellation of the inferior frontal and midcingulate cortices in a flanker-stop-change paradigm.

Authors:  Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert; Tom Eichele; Karsten Specht; Harald Kugel; Christo Pantev; René J Huster
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Profiles of executive functioning: associations with substance dependence and risky sexual behavior.

Authors:  Sarit A Golub; Tyrel J Starks; William J Kowalczyk; Louisa I Thompson; Jeffrey T Parsons
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2012-07-09

3.  Performance monitoring local field potentials in the medial frontal cortex of primates: supplementary eye field.

Authors:  Erik E Emeric; Melanie Leslie; Pierre Pouget; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Conflict in cingulate cortex function between humans and macaque monkeys: More apparent than real.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall; Erik E Emeric
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 1.808

5.  The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the inhibition of stereotyped responses.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kadota; Hirofumi Sekiguchi; Shigeki Takeuchi; Makoto Miyazaki; Yutaka Kohno; Yasoichi Nakajima
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Impulsivities and addictions: a multidimensional integrative framework informing assessment and interventions for substance use disorders.

Authors:  Jasmin Vassileva; Patricia J Conrod
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Daniel D Langleben; James W Loughead; Warren B Bilker; Kosha Ruparel; Anna Rose Childress; Samantha I Busch; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Cingulate activation increases dynamically with response speed under stimulus unpredictability.

Authors:  Britta Hahn; Thomas J Ross; Elliot A Stein
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Medial prefrontal cortex predicts and evaluates the timing of action outcomes.

Authors:  Sarah E Forster; Joshua W Brown
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Too little, too late or too much, too early? Differential hemodynamics of response inhibition in high and low sensation seekers.

Authors:  Heather R Collins; Christine R Corbly; Xun Liu; Thomas H Kelly; Donald Lynam; Jane E Joseph
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.