P T Daley-Yates1, R L Kunka, Y Yin, S M Andrews, S Callejas, C Ng. 1. GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development, Clinical Pharmacology and Discovery Medicine, Greenford Road, UB6 0HE Greenford, Middlesex, UK. Peter.T.Daley-Yates@gsk.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the systemic exposure for intranasal mometasone furoate (MF) and fluticasone propionate (FP) aqueous nasal sprays (ANS) in terms of serum and urinary cortisol parameters and plasma pharmacokinetics. METHODS:Twelve healthy subjects completed this three-way, cross-over study. They received FPANS (50 microg/spray), MFANS (50 microg/spray) or placebo ANS, eight sprays per nostril every 8 h for 4 days. Cortisol measurements were made at baseline and day 4. FP and MFplasma concentrations were also measured on day 4. RESULTS:MFANS produced similar mean plasma AUC (123 pmol/l h) to FPANS (112 pmol/l h). Despite the use of high doses, necessary to generate adequate pharmacokinetic data, only minor reductions in cortisol parameters were found, with no difference between FPANS and MFANS. CONCLUSIONS:FP and MF have similar and very low systemic bioavailability when administered intranasally using a high-dose regimen. It is therefore unlikely that therapeutic doses of intranasal FP or MF will produce dissimilar or significant degrees of systemic exposure or systemic effects.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To compare the systemic exposure for intranasal mometasone furoate (MF) and fluticasone propionate (FP) aqueous nasal sprays (ANS) in terms of serum and urinary cortisol parameters and plasma pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Twelve healthy subjects completed this three-way, cross-over study. They received FPANS (50 microg/spray), MFANS (50 microg/spray) or placebo ANS, eight sprays per nostril every 8 h for 4 days. Cortisol measurements were made at baseline and day 4. FP and MF plasma concentrations were also measured on day 4. RESULTS:MFANS produced similar mean plasma AUC (123 pmol/l h) to FPANS (112 pmol/l h). Despite the use of high doses, necessary to generate adequate pharmacokinetic data, only minor reductions in cortisol parameters were found, with no difference between FPANS and MFANS. CONCLUSIONS: FP and MF have similar and very low systemic bioavailability when administered intranasally using a high-dose regimen. It is therefore unlikely that therapeutic doses of intranasal FP or MF will produce dissimilar or significant degrees of systemic exposure or systemic effects.