Literature DB >> 15114302

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: long-term outcomes in a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Shouichi Tanaka1, Tomoyuki Sawayama, Toshifumi Yoshioka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the long-term outcome of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones. A randomized trial that compared long-term outcomes after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy was conducted.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients with bile duct stones were randomized to endoscopic papillary balloon dilation or endoscopic sphincterotomy, with 16 patients in each group. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation was performed by using an 8-mm-diameter balloon; endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in the standard manner. The success rates for stone removal, as well as the frequency and types of early (<15 days), mid-term (<1 year), and long-term (1-6 years) post-procedure complications were evaluated.
RESULTS: The success rates for stone removal and early complication rates were similar for both groups. The frequency of stone recurrence was approximately 4-fold higher in the endoscopic papillary balloon dilation group (25%) vs. the endoscopic sphincterotomy group (6.3%) at mid-term evaluation. However, over the long term, Kaplan-Meier estimated probability of stone recurrence tended to be higher in the endoscopic sphincterotomy group vs. the endoscopic papillary balloon dilation group; recurrent stones were found in, respectively, 26.7% vs. 6.3%. Complications occurred in 7 patients in each group.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcome of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stone removal is satisfactory, provided that consideration is given to recurrence of stones by early follow-up evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15114302     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)00157-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  23 in total

1.  Comparison of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and sphincterotomy in young patients with CBD stones and gallstones.

Authors:  Yu Ri Seo; Jong Ho Moon; Hyun Jong Choi; Dong Choon Kim; Ji Su Ha; Tae Hoon Lee; Sang-Woo Cha; Young Deok Cho; Sang-Heum Park; Sun-Joo Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Small sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs sphincterotomy alone for removal of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Shi-Bin Guo; Hua Meng; Zhi-Jun Duan; Chun-Yan Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Comparison of long-term outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation: a propensity score-based cohort analysis.

Authors:  Shinpei Doi; Ichiro Yasuda; Tsuyoshi Mukai; Takuji Iwashita; Shinya Uemura; Takahiro Yamauchi; Masanori Nakashima; Seiji Adachi; Masahito Shimizu; Eiichi Tomita; Takao Itoi; Hisataka Moriwaki
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 4.  Comparison of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones.

Authors:  Yuji Sakai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Harutoshi Sugiyama; Masahiro Hayashi; Jun-Ichi Senoo; Yuko Kusakabe; Shin Yasui; Rintaro Mikata; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-05-25

5.  Topical nitrate drip infusion using cystic duct tube for retained bile duct stone: A six patients case series.

Authors:  Masatoshi Shoji; Hiroshi Sakuma; Yutaka Yoshimitsu; Tsutomu Maeda; Masuo Nakai; Hiroshi Ueda
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-06-27

Review 6.  Reappraisal of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kwok-Hung Lai; Hoi-Hung Chan; Tzung-Jiun Tsai; Jin-Shiung Cheng; Ping-I Hsu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-16

Review 7.  Balloon dilation itself may not be a major determinant of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.

Authors:  Sung Ill Jang; Gak Won Yun; Dong Ki Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Is endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation really a risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis?

Authors:  Toshio Fujisawa; Koichi Kagawa; Kantaro Hisatomi; Kensuke Kubota; Atsushi Nakajima; Nobuyuki Matsuhashi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation: revival of the old technique.

Authors:  Seung Uk Jeong; Sung-Hoon Moon; Myung-Hwan Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Small sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation versus sphincterotomy.

Authors:  Hyun Gun Kim; Young Koog Cheon; Young Deok Cho; Jong Ho Moon; Do Hyun Park; Tae Hoon Lee; Hyun Jong Choi; Sang-Heum Park; Joon Seong Lee; Moon Sung Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.