BACKGROUND: This study examined long-term outcome from severe forebrain ischemia in the rat, as a function of anesthetic given during the ischemic injury. METHODS: Rats were subjected to 10 min of near-complete forebrain ischemia while anesthetized with either 1.4% isoflurane or 70% nitrous oxide-fentanyl. Neurologic and histologic outcomes were measured at 5 days, 3 weeks, or 3 months after ischemia. RESULTS: At 5 days, isoflurane-anesthetized rats had less damage than did fentanyl-nitrous oxide-anesthetized rats (mean +/- SD, percent alive hippocampal CA1 neurons = 58+/-29 vs. 20+/-16, respectively; P = 0.011). This was accompanied by improved motor function in the isoflurane group (P = 0.002). At 3 weeks, there was no difference between groups for either outcome variable (percent alive CA1 neurons = 35+/-26 and 36+/-28 for isoflurane and fentanyl-nitrous oxide, respectively). Similarly, at 3 months, there was no difference between groups (percent alive CA1 neurons = 56+/-27 and 60+/-27 for isoflurane and fentanyl-nitrous oxide, respectively). Morris water maze performance at 3 months was similar between anesthetic groups and was also similar to sham performance. The percent alive CA1 neurons in the fentanyl-nitrous oxide group increased with duration of recovery (P = 0.004). There were no differences among isoflurane groups over time (5 days vs. 3 weeks, P = 0.26; 5 days vs. 3 months, P = 0.99; 3 week vs. 3 months, P = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no change in the percent alive CA1 hippocampal neurons as a function of duration of recovery from severe forebrain ischemia in isoflurane anesthetized rats. In contrast, the percent alive CA1 neurons in fentanyl-nitrous oxide-anesthetized rats tripled over 3 months of recovery. The natural history of long-term responses to forebrain ischemia requires further study before conclusions can be drawn with respect to the permanence of isoflurane neuroprotection.
BACKGROUND: This study examined long-term outcome from severe forebrain ischemia in the rat, as a function of anesthetic given during the ischemic injury. METHODS:Rats were subjected to 10 min of near-complete forebrain ischemia while anesthetized with either 1.4% isoflurane or 70% nitrous oxide-fentanyl. Neurologic and histologic outcomes were measured at 5 days, 3 weeks, or 3 months after ischemia. RESULTS: At 5 days, isoflurane-anesthetized rats had less damage than did fentanyl-nitrous oxide-anesthetized rats (mean +/- SD, percent alive hippocampal CA1 neurons = 58+/-29 vs. 20+/-16, respectively; P = 0.011). This was accompanied by improved motor function in the isoflurane group (P = 0.002). At 3 weeks, there was no difference between groups for either outcome variable (percent alive CA1 neurons = 35+/-26 and 36+/-28 for isoflurane and fentanyl-nitrous oxide, respectively). Similarly, at 3 months, there was no difference between groups (percent alive CA1 neurons = 56+/-27 and 60+/-27 for isoflurane and fentanyl-nitrous oxide, respectively). Morris water maze performance at 3 months was similar between anesthetic groups and was also similar to sham performance. The percent alive CA1 neurons in the fentanyl-nitrous oxide group increased with duration of recovery (P = 0.004). There were no differences among isoflurane groups over time (5 days vs. 3 weeks, P = 0.26; 5 days vs. 3 months, P = 0.99; 3 week vs. 3 months, P = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no change in the percent alive CA1 hippocampal neurons as a function of duration of recovery from severe forebrain ischemia in isoflurane anesthetized rats. In contrast, the percent alive CA1 neurons in fentanyl-nitrous oxide-anesthetized rats tripled over 3 months of recovery. The natural history of long-term responses to forebrain ischemia requires further study before conclusions can be drawn with respect to the permanence of isoflurane neuroprotection.
Authors: Joseph N Hemerka; Xianren Wu; C Edward Dixon; Robert H Garman; Jennifer L Exo; David K Shellington; Brian Blasiole; Vincent A Vagni; Keri Janesko-Feldman; Mu Xu; Stephen R Wisniewski; Hülya Bayır; Larry W Jenkins; Robert S B Clark; Samuel A Tisherman; Patrick M Kochanek Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2012-08-10 Impact factor: 5.269