Literature DB >> 15113873

Assessment of reliability of microarray data and estimation of signal thresholds using mixture modeling.

Musa H Asyali1, Mohamed M Shoukri, Omer Demirkaya, Khalid S A Khabar.   

Abstract

DNA microarray is an important tool for the study of gene activities but the resultant data consisting of thousands of points are error-prone. A serious limitation in microarray analysis is the unreliability of the data generated from low signal intensities. Such data may produce erroneous gene expression ratios and cause unnecessary validation or post-analysis follow-up tasks. In this study, we describe an approach based on normal mixture modeling for determining optimal signal intensity thresholds to identify reliable measurements of the microarray elements and subsequently eliminate false expression ratios. We used univariate and bivariate mixture modeling to segregate the microarray data into two classes, low signal intensity and reliable signal intensity populations, and applied Bayesian decision theory to find the optimal signal thresholds. The bivariate analysis approach was found to be more accurate than the univariate approach; both approaches were superior to a conventional method when validated against a reference set of biological data that consisted of true and false gene expression data. Elimination of unreliable signal intensities in microarray data should contribute to the quality of microarray data including reproducibility and reliability of gene expression ratios.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15113873      PMCID: PMC419441          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  21 in total

1.  Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles.

Authors:  T R Hughes; M J Marton; A R Jones; C J Roberts; R Stoughton; C D Armour; H A Bennett; E Coffey; H Dai; Y D He; M J Kidd; A M King; M R Meyer; D Slade; P Y Lum; S B Stepaniants; D D Shoemaker; D Gachotte; K Chakraburtty; J Simon; M Bard; S H Friend
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-07-07       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  A mixture model-based approach to the clustering of microarray expression data.

Authors:  G J McLachlan; R W Bean; D Peel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Microarray optimizations: increasing spot accuracy and automated identification of true microarray signals.

Authors:  Peter H Tran; Daniel A Peiffer; Yongchol Shin; Lauren M Meek; James P Brody; Ken W Y Cho
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  GP3: GenePix post-processing program for automated analysis of raw microarray data.

Authors:  M R Fielden; R G Halgren; E Dere; T R Zacharewski
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Significance and statistical errors in the analysis of DNA microarray data.

Authors:  James P Brody; Brian A Williams; Barbara J Wold; Stephen R Quake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Parametric estimation in a genetic mixture model with application to nuclear family data.

Authors:  M M Shoukri; G J McLachlan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A carbocyclic nucleoside analogue is a TNF-alpha inhibitor with immunosuppressive action: role of prostaglandin E2 and protein kinase C and comparison with pentoxifylline.

Authors:  A Al-Humidan; C K Edwards; A Al-Sofi; M Dzimiri; S T Al-Sedairy; K S Khabar
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  1998-08-25       Impact factor: 4.868

8.  p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent and -independent signaling of mRNA stability of AU-rich element-containing transcripts.

Authors:  Mathias A E Frevel; Tala Bakheet; Aristobolo M Silva; John G Hissong; Khalid S A Khabar; Bryan R G Williams
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Defining signal thresholds in DNA microarrays: exemplary application for invasive cancer.

Authors:  M Bilban; L K Buehler; S Head; G Desoye; V Quaranta
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Gene expression signature of fibroblast serum response predicts human cancer progression: similarities between tumors and wounds.

Authors:  Howard Y Chang; Julie B Sneddon; Ash A Alizadeh; Ruchira Sood; Rob B West; Kelli Montgomery; Jen-Tsan Chi; Matt van de Rijn; David Botstein; Patrick O Brown
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  7 in total

1.  An inexpensive gel electrophoresis-based polymerase chain reaction method for quantifying mRNA levels.

Authors:  William D Bradford; Laty Cahoon; Sara R Freel; Laura L Mays Hoopes; Todd T Eckdahl
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

2.  Proteinase and growth factor alterations revealed by gene microarray analysis of human diabetic corneas.

Authors:  Mehrnoosh Saghizadeh; Andrei A Kramerov; Jian Tajbakhsh; Annette M Aoki; Charles Wang; Ning-Ning Chai; Julia Y Ljubimova; Takako Sasaki; Gabriel Sosne; Marc R J Carlson; Stanley F Nelson; Alexander V Ljubimov
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The RNA-binding zinc-finger protein tristetraprolin regulates AU-rich mRNAs involved in breast cancer-related processes.

Authors:  N Al-Souhibani; W Al-Ahmadi; J E Hesketh; P J Blackshear; K S A Khabar
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Differential translocation of nuclear factor-kappaB in a cardiac muscle cell line under gravitational changes.

Authors:  Ohwon Kwon; Michael Tranter; W Keith Jones; John M Sankovic; Rupak K Banerjee
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Large-scale analysis of network bistability for human cancers.

Authors:  Tetsuya Shiraishi; Shinako Matsuyama; Hiroaki Kitano
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Competing interactions between micro-RNAs determine neural progenitor survival and proliferation after ethanol exposure: evidence from an ex vivo model of the fetal cerebral cortical neuroepithelium.

Authors:  Pratheesh Sathyan; Honey B Golden; Rajesh C Miranda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Microarray and EST database estimates of mRNA expression levels differ: the protein length versus expression curve for C. elegans.

Authors:  Enrique T Munoz; Leonard D Bogarad; Michael W Deem
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2004-05-10       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.