Literature DB >> 15113725

Body movement and physical activity energy expenditure in children and adolescents: how to adjust for differences in body size and age.

Ulf Ekelund1, Agneta Yngve, Sören Brage, Klaas Westerterp, Michael Sjöström.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical activity data in children and adolescents who differ in body size and age are influenced by whether physical activity is expressed in terms of body movement or energy expenditure.
OBJECTIVE: We examined whether physical activity expressed as body movement (ie, accelerometer counts) differs from physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) as a function of body size and age.
DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study in children [n = 26; (+/-SD) age: 9.6 +/- 0.3 y] and adolescents (n = 25; age: 17.6 +/- 1.5 y) in which body movement and total energy expenditure (TEE) were simultaneously measured with the use of accelerometry and the doubly labeled water method, respectively. PAEE was expressed as 1) unadjusted PAEE [TEE minus resting energy expenditure (REE); in MJ/d], 2) PAEE adjusted for body weight (BW) (PAEE. kg(-1). d(-1)), 3) PAEE adjusted for fat-free mass (FFM) (PAEE. kg FFM(-1). d(-1)), and 4) the physical activity level (PAL = TEE/REE).
RESULTS: Body movement was significantly higher (P = 0.03) in children than in adolescents. Similarly, when PAEE was normalized for differences in BW or FFM, it was significantly higher in children than in adolescents (P = 0.03). In contrast, unadjusted PAEE and PAL were significantly higher in adolescents (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: PAEE should be normalized for BW or FFM for comparison of physical activity between children and adolescents who differ in body size and age. Adjusting PAEE for FFM removes the confounding effect of sex, and therefore FFM may be the most appropriate body-composition variable for normalization of PAEE. Unadjusted PAEE and PAL depend on body size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15113725     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/79.5.851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  27 in total

1.  Experimentally Manipulated Low Social Status and Food Insecurity Alter Eating Behavior Among Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Michelle I Cardel; Greg Pavela; David Janicke; Tianyao Huo; Darci Miller; Alexandra M Lee; Matthew J Gurka; Emily Dhurandhar; John C Peters; Ann E Caldwell; Eric Krause; Alicia Fernandez; David B Allison
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.002

2.  Evaluation of the effect of signalment and body conformation on activity monitoring in companion dogs.

Authors:  Dorothy Cimino Brown; Kathryn E Michel; Molly Love; Caitlin Dow
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.156

3.  Determining activity monitor wear time: an influential decision rule.

Authors:  Wendy C King; Jia Li; Kira Leishear; James E Mitchell; Steven H Belle
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2011-05

4.  Assessing physical activity in persons with knee osteoarthritis using accelerometers: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Jing Song; Pamela Semanik; Leena Sharma; Rowland W Chang; Marc C Hochberg; W Jerry Mysiw; Joan M Bathon; Charles B Eaton; Rebecca Jackson; C Kent Kwoh; Michael Nevitt; Dorothy D Dunlop
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Energy expenditure and adiposity in Nigerian and African-American women.

Authors:  Kara E Ebersole; Lara R Dugas; Ramon A Durazo-Arvizut; Adebowale A Adeyemo; Bamidele O Tayo; Olayemi O Omotade; William R Brieger; Dale A Schoeller; Richard S Cooper; Amy H Luke
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.002

6.  Environmental influences on children's physical activity: quantitative estimates using a twin design.

Authors:  Abigail Fisher; Cornelia H M van Jaarsveld; Clare H Llewellyn; Jane Wardle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Physical activity in preschoolers: understanding prevalence and measurement issues.

Authors:  Melody Oliver; Grant M Schofield; Gregory S Kolt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Assessment of differing definitions of accelerometer nonwear time.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; James W Terry
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  Physical activity attenuates the mid-adolescent peak in insulin resistance but by late adolescence the effect is lost: a longitudinal study with annual measures from 9-16 years (EarlyBird 66).

Authors:  Brad S Metcalf; Joanne Hosking; William E Henley; Alison N Jeffery; Mohammod Mostazir; Linda D Voss; Terence J Wilkin
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Increasing overall physical activity and aerobic fitness is associated with improvements in metabolic risk: cohort analysis of the ProActive trial.

Authors:  R K Simmons; S J Griffin; R Steele; N J Wareham; U Ekelund
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.