BACKGROUND: Body composition differs between African American (AA) and white women, and the resting metabolic rate (RMR) is likely to be lower in AA women than in white women. OBJECTIVE: We tested 2 hypotheses: that AA women have a greater proportion of low-metabolic-rate skeletal muscle (SM) and bone than do white women and that between-race musculoskeletal differences are a function of body weight. DESIGN: Hypothesis 1 was tested by comparing SM, bone, adipose tissue, and high-metabolic-rate residual mass across 22 pairs of matched AA and white women. Magnetic resonance imaging and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were used to partition weight into 4 components, and RMR was both calculated from tissue-organ mass and measured. Hypothesis 2 was evaluated by measuring SM, bone, fat, and residual mass in 521 AA and white women with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry alone. RESULTS: Hypothesis 1: AA women had greater SM ( +/- SD group difference: 1.52 +/- 2.48 kg; P < 0.01) and musculoskeletal mass (1.72 +/- 2.66 kg; P < 0.01) than did white women. RMR calculated from body composition and measured RMR did not differ; RMR estimated by both approaches tended to be lower (approximately 160 kJ/d) in AA women than in white women. Hypothesis 2: SM was significantly correlated with weight, height, age, and race x weight interaction; greater SM in the AA women was a function of body weight. CONCLUSIONS: Lower RMRs in AA women than in white women are related to corresponding differences in the proportions of heat-producing tissues and organs, and these race-related body-composition differences increase as a function of body weight.
BACKGROUND: Body composition differs between African American (AA) and white women, and the resting metabolic rate (RMR) is likely to be lower in AA women than in white women. OBJECTIVE: We tested 2 hypotheses: that AA women have a greater proportion of low-metabolic-rate skeletal muscle (SM) and bone than do white women and that between-race musculoskeletal differences are a function of body weight. DESIGN: Hypothesis 1 was tested by comparing SM, bone, adipose tissue, and high-metabolic-rate residual mass across 22 pairs of matched AA and white women. Magnetic resonance imaging and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were used to partition weight into 4 components, and RMR was both calculated from tissue-organ mass and measured. Hypothesis 2 was evaluated by measuring SM, bone, fat, and residual mass in 521 AA and white women with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry alone. RESULTS: Hypothesis 1: AA women had greater SM ( +/- SD group difference: 1.52 +/- 2.48 kg; P < 0.01) and musculoskeletal mass (1.72 +/- 2.66 kg; P < 0.01) than did white women. RMR calculated from body composition and measured RMR did not differ; RMR estimated by both approaches tended to be lower (approximately 160 kJ/d) in AA women than in white women. Hypothesis 2: SM was significantly correlated with weight, height, age, and race x weight interaction; greater SM in the AA women was a function of body weight. CONCLUSIONS: Lower RMRs in AA women than in white women are related to corresponding differences in the proportions of heat-producing tissues and organs, and these race-related body-composition differences increase as a function of body weight.
Authors: Guilherme S Mazzini; Jad Khoraki; Matthew G Browning; Bernardo M Pessoa; Luke G Wolfe; Guilherme M Campos Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Crystal C Douglas; Jeannine C Lawrence; Nikki C Bush; Robert A Oster; Barbara A Gower; Betty E Darnell Journal: Nutr Res Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Marie-Pierre St-Onge; Amy L Roberts; Jinya Chen; Michael Kelleman; Majella O'Keeffe; Arindam RoyChoudhury; Peter J H Jones Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: S B Heymsfield; C M Peterson; B Bourgeois; D M Thomas; D Gallagher; B Strauss; M J Müller; A Bosy-Westphal Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Thomas A Wadden; Delia S West; Rebecca H Neiberg; Rena R Wing; Donna H Ryan; Karen C Johnson; John P Foreyt; James O Hill; Dace L Trence; Mara Z Vitolins Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2009-01-29 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Steven J Prior; Stephen M Roth; Xiaojing Wang; Candace Kammerer; Iva Miljkovic-Gacic; Clareann H Bunker; Victor W Wheeler; Alan L Patrick; Joseph M Zmuda Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2007-07-26