Literature DB >> 15113715

Body-composition differences between African American and white women: relation to resting energy requirements.

Alfredo Jones1, Wei Shen, Marie-Pierre St-Onge, Dympna Gallagher, Stanley Heshka, ZiMian Wang, Steven B Heymsfield.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Body composition differs between African American (AA) and white women, and the resting metabolic rate (RMR) is likely to be lower in AA women than in white women.
OBJECTIVE: We tested 2 hypotheses: that AA women have a greater proportion of low-metabolic-rate skeletal muscle (SM) and bone than do white women and that between-race musculoskeletal differences are a function of body weight.
DESIGN: Hypothesis 1 was tested by comparing SM, bone, adipose tissue, and high-metabolic-rate residual mass across 22 pairs of matched AA and white women. Magnetic resonance imaging and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were used to partition weight into 4 components, and RMR was both calculated from tissue-organ mass and measured. Hypothesis 2 was evaluated by measuring SM, bone, fat, and residual mass in 521 AA and white women with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry alone.
RESULTS: Hypothesis 1: AA women had greater SM ( +/- SD group difference: 1.52 +/- 2.48 kg; P < 0.01) and musculoskeletal mass (1.72 +/- 2.66 kg; P < 0.01) than did white women. RMR calculated from body composition and measured RMR did not differ; RMR estimated by both approaches tended to be lower (approximately 160 kJ/d) in AA women than in white women. Hypothesis 2: SM was significantly correlated with weight, height, age, and race x weight interaction; greater SM in the AA women was a function of body weight.
CONCLUSIONS: Lower RMRs in AA women than in white women are related to corresponding differences in the proportions of heat-producing tissues and organs, and these race-related body-composition differences increase as a function of body weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15113715     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/79.5.780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of segmental body composition estimated by bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Brooks C Wingo; Valene Garr Barry; Amy C Ellis; Barbara A Gower
Journal:  Clin Nutr ESPEN       Date:  2018-09-11

2.  Population Diversity Challenge the External Validity of the European Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Guilherme S Mazzini; Jad Khoraki; Matthew G Browning; Bernardo M Pessoa; Luke G Wolfe; Guilherme M Campos
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Ability of the Harris Benedict formula to predict energy requirements differs with weight history and ethnicity.

Authors:  Crystal C Douglas; Jeannine C Lawrence; Nikki C Bush; Robert A Oster; Barbara A Gower; Betty E Darnell
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Differences between brain mass and body weight scaling to height: potential mechanism of reduced mass-specific resting energy expenditure of taller adults.

Authors:  Steven B Heymsfield; Thamrong Chirachariyavej; Im Joo Rhyu; Chulaporn Roongpisuthipong; Moonseong Heo; Angelo Pietrobelli
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-11-13

Review 5.  Weight loss composition is one-fourth fat-free mass: a critical review and critique of this widely cited rule.

Authors:  S B Heymsfield; M C C Gonzalez; W Shen; L Redman; D Thomas
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 9.213

6.  Exploring the "Obesity Paradox" as a Correlate of Cognitive and Physical Function in Community-dwelling Black and White Older Adults.

Authors:  Jeannine S Skinner; Willie Mae Abel; Katryna McCoy; Consuelo H Wilkins
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 1.847

7.  Short sleep duration increases energy intakes but does not change energy expenditure in normal-weight individuals.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre St-Onge; Amy L Roberts; Jinya Chen; Michael Kelleman; Majella O'Keeffe; Arindam RoyChoudhury; Peter J H Jones
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 8.  Human energy expenditure: advances in organ-tissue prediction models.

Authors:  S B Heymsfield; C M Peterson; B Bourgeois; D M Thomas; D Gallagher; B Strauss; M J Müller; A Bosy-Westphal
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 9.213

9.  One-year weight losses in the Look AHEAD study: factors associated with success.

Authors:  Thomas A Wadden; Delia S West; Rebecca H Neiberg; Rena R Wing; Donna H Ryan; Karen C Johnson; John P Foreyt; James O Hill; Dace L Trence; Mara Z Vitolins
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 5.002

10.  Genetic and environmental influences on skeletal muscle phenotypes as a function of age and sex in large, multigenerational families of African heritage.

Authors:  Steven J Prior; Stephen M Roth; Xiaojing Wang; Candace Kammerer; Iva Miljkovic-Gacic; Clareann H Bunker; Victor W Wheeler; Alan L Patrick; Joseph M Zmuda
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2007-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.