BACKGROUND: Glycine substitution mutations in COL7A1 not only cause dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DDEB), but can also be silent mutations which lead to recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) in combination with additional mutations in the other allele. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we have examined a large American Caucasian pedigree in which 10 family members from four generations presented with simple toenail dystrophy without skin fragility in autosomal dominant manner. METHOD: We sequenced COL7A1 of this pedigree. RESULTS: Mutational analysis indeed detected a heterozygous G-to-A transition at nucleotide position 6082 leading to G2028R in all the affected members. Surprisingly, mutation database revealed that this G2028R mutation had been previously identified in two distinct Asian families with DDEB showing apparent skin fragility and blister formation. One case was a 17-month-old Chinese female with classical phenotype of DDEB and the other was a 27-year-old Japanese female with typical epidermolysis bullosa (EB) pruriginosa. To better understand the molecular mechanisms of this marked inter-familiar clinical heterogeneity, we examined the entire sequence of all the exons and exon-intron borders as well as the promoter region of COL7A1 in all the three families. Sequence results demonstrated no significant nucleotide difference in COL7A1 among the three pedigrees. CONCLUSION: This paper has demonstrated for the first time that identical COL7A1 glycine substitutions can cause remarkably heterogeneous clinical phenotypes extending from simple toe nail dystrophy without skin fragility to typical DDEB and EB pruriginosa. In addition, the fact of inter-familiar, not intra-familiar clinical heterogeneity associated with G2028R suggest that the other molecular mechanisms not controlled by COL7A1 coding sequence might be responsible for the clinical heterogeneity. Copyright 2004 Japanese Society for Investigative Dermatology
BACKGROUND:Glycine substitution mutations in COL7A1 not only cause dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DDEB), but can also be silent mutations which lead to recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) in combination with additional mutations in the other allele. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we have examined a large American Caucasian pedigree in which 10 family members from four generations presented with simple toenail dystrophy without skin fragility in autosomal dominant manner. METHOD: We sequenced COL7A1 of this pedigree. RESULTS: Mutational analysis indeed detected a heterozygous G-to-A transition at nucleotide position 6082 leading to G2028R in all the affected members. Surprisingly, mutation database revealed that this G2028R mutation had been previously identified in two distinct Asian families with DDEB showing apparent skin fragility and blister formation. One case was a 17-month-old Chinese female with classical phenotype of DDEB and the other was a 27-year-old Japanese female with typical epidermolysis bullosa (EB) pruriginosa. To better understand the molecular mechanisms of this marked inter-familiar clinical heterogeneity, we examined the entire sequence of all the exons and exon-intron borders as well as the promoter region of COL7A1 in all the three families. Sequence results demonstrated no significant nucleotide difference in COL7A1 among the three pedigrees. CONCLUSION: This paper has demonstrated for the first time that identical COL7A1glycine substitutions can cause remarkably heterogeneous clinical phenotypes extending from simple toe nail dystrophy without skin fragility to typical DDEB and EB pruriginosa. In addition, the fact of inter-familiar, not intra-familiar clinical heterogeneity associated with G2028R suggest that the other molecular mechanisms not controlled by COL7A1 coding sequence might be responsible for the clinical heterogeneity. Copyright 2004 Japanese Society for Investigative Dermatology
Authors: Catherine S Yang; Yin Lu; Anita Farhi; Carol Nelson-Williams; Michael Kashgarian; Earl J Glusac; Richard P Lifton; Richard J Antaya; Keith A Choate Journal: Pediatr Dermatol Date: 2012-04-20 Impact factor: 1.588