Anna Read1, Helen Ramwell, Helen Storer, Jonathan Webber. 1. Obesity Management, Queens Medical Centre Nottingham, University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. anna.read@mail.qmcuh-tr.trent.nhs.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity is a growing problem, with its associated morbidity, mortality, and economic costs. Treatment options and the availability of resources are limited and inconsistent. AIM: To implement and evaluate a primary care dietitian-run weight management programme. DESIGN OF STUDY: Pilot intervention study. SETTING: Three health centres in the north locality of Nottingham City Primary Care Trust. METHOD: Two hundred and sixteen individuals, with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m(2) and coronary heart disease risk factors, were recruited to attend education and support groups. Changes in BMI, waist circumference, percentage body fat, blood pressure, blood lipids, glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), and assessment of psychological wellbeing using the "short form" (SF-36) general health questionnaire, were conducted at 0, 3, and 12 months. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty patients completed the 3-month phase, and 75 completed the follow-up 9-month phase. Four per cent of patients entering the programme achieved a 10% weight loss, and 13% achieved a weight loss between 5 and 10%. Those continuing to attend achieved a mean weight loss of 2.9% (mean = 3.1 kg, ranging from a loss of 23.6 kg to a gain of 3.8 kg, P < 0.001) at 3 months, which was maintained at 12 months. Waist circumference, percentage body fat, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, HbA(1c) (in those with diabetes) (P < 0.001), and triglycerides (P = 0.004) showed reduction. Psychological wellbeing improved in seven of the nine categories of the SF-36. CONCLUSION: Those who continued to attend the programme showed significant reduction in weight and other clinical parameters at 3 months, and this was maintained at 1 year with less intensive support. An attrition rate of approximately 66% by 12 months demonstrated that, in spite of intensive dietetic resources, patient retention and follow-up of progress was difficult.
BACKGROUND:Obesity is a growing problem, with its associated morbidity, mortality, and economic costs. Treatment options and the availability of resources are limited and inconsistent. AIM: To implement and evaluate a primary care dietitian-run weight management programme. DESIGN OF STUDY: Pilot intervention study. SETTING: Three health centres in the north locality of Nottingham City Primary Care Trust. METHOD: Two hundred and sixteen individuals, with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m(2) and coronary heart disease risk factors, were recruited to attend education and support groups. Changes in BMI, waist circumference, percentage body fat, blood pressure, blood lipids, glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), and assessment of psychological wellbeing using the "short form" (SF-36) general health questionnaire, were conducted at 0, 3, and 12 months. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty patients completed the 3-month phase, and 75 completed the follow-up 9-month phase. Four per cent of patients entering the programme achieved a 10% weight loss, and 13% achieved a weight loss between 5 and 10%. Those continuing to attend achieved a mean weight loss of 2.9% (mean = 3.1 kg, ranging from a loss of 23.6 kg to a gain of 3.8 kg, P < 0.001) at 3 months, which was maintained at 12 months. Waist circumference, percentage body fat, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, HbA(1c) (in those with diabetes) (P < 0.001), and triglycerides (P = 0.004) showed reduction. Psychological wellbeing improved in seven of the nine categories of the SF-36. CONCLUSION: Those who continued to attend the programme showed significant reduction in weight and other clinical parameters at 3 months, and this was maintained at 1 year with less intensive support. An attrition rate of approximately 66% by 12 months demonstrated that, in spite of intensive dietetic resources, patient retention and follow-up of progress was difficult.
Authors: W P James; A Astrup; N Finer; J Hilsted; P Kopelman; S Rössner; W H Saris; L F Van Gaal Journal: Lancet Date: 2000 Dec 23-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Helen Moore; Carolyn D Summerbell; Darren C Greenwood; Philip Tovey; Jacqui Griffiths; Maureen Henderson; Kate Hesketh; Sally Woolgar; Ashley J Adamson Journal: BMJ Date: 2003-11-08
Authors: Charles B Eaton; Sheri J Hartman; Elizabeth Perzanowski; Guohui Pan; Mary B Roberts; Patricia M Risica; Kim M Gans; John M Jakicic; Bess H Marcus Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Sheri J Hartman; Patricia M Risica; Kim M Gans; Bess H Marcus; Charles B Eaton Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2014-06-15 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Oliver Cronin; Barbara Bradshaw; Vikram Iyer; Margaret Cunningham; Petra Buttner; Philip J Walker; Jonathan Golledge Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: M Aceves-Martins; C Robertson; D Cooper; A Avenell; F Stewart; P Aveyard; M de Bruin Journal: J Hum Nutr Diet Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 3.089