Literature DB >> 15113461

Resource use after subarachnoid hemorrhage: comparison between endovascular and surgical treatment.

Minna Niskanen1, Timo Koivisto, Antti Ronkainen, Jaakko Rinne, Esko Ruokonen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare resource use after endovascular treatment and surgical clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
METHODS: The study population consisted of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who were actively treated in Kuopio University Hospital. The baseline patients' characteristics were obtained from the institution's aneurysm registry. Variables indicating resource use in the intensive care unit (ICU) were obtained from the ICU patient data management system. The Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System was used to measure the intensity of treatment in the ICU. All care days in the ICU and in the hospital and all Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System points that were accumulated during the 12-month follow-up period were calculated. Outcomes were assessed according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 68 patients who underwent endovascular treatment and 103 patients who had surgery. The median lengths of stay in the ICU (1.7 versus 1.8 d) and the hospital (14.0 versus 15.0 d), as well as the accumulated Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System points (56 versus 55), among patients who underwent endovascular or surgical treatment were similar (P = NS for all). The modality of treatment did not influence the number of ICU or hospital patient days or the intensity of ICU treatment, regardless of the patient's preoperative clinical status.
CONCLUSION: The modality of treatment of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage does not seem to affect resource use. Endovascular and surgical treatment are likely to require a similar amount of ICU resources in the year after initial treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15113461     DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000119350.80122.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  4 in total

1.  A predictive model of hospitalization cost after cerebral aneurysm clipping.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Symeon Missios; Todd A MacKenzie; Nicos Labropoulos; David W Roberts
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.836

2.  Early clinical course after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: comparison of patients treated with Woven EndoBridge, microsurgical clipping, or endovascular coiling.

Authors:  Thomas Sauvigny; Marie Teresa Nawka; Nils Schweingruber; Marius Marc-Daniel Mader; Jan Regelsberger; Nils Ole Schmidt; Manfred Westphal; Patrick Czorlich
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 3.  Economic and Humanistic Burden of Cerebral Vasospasm and Its Related Complications after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Juliette C Thompson; François-Xavier Chalet; Eric J Manalastas; Neil Hawkins; Grammati Sarri; Darren A Talbot
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2022-04-20

4.  Endovascular coiling versus microsurgical clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Chao Peng; Yu-Hang Diao; Shi-Fei Cai; Xin-Yu Yang
Journal:  Chin Neurosurg J       Date:  2022-07-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.