Literature DB >> 15113376

Current performance of patient sample collection in the UK.

M F Murphy1, B E Stearn, W H Dzik.   

Abstract

Collection of the patient sample for pretransfusion testing begins a complex chain of events in the transfusion process. Hospitals in England and North Wales were surveyed to compare local policies against recommendations of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH). Hospitals also measured the frequency of rejected and miscollected samples [designated as wrong blood in tube (WBIT)]. 185 of 360 (51.4%) hospitals returned questionnaires and 182 of 185 (98%) hospitals reported that a policy for sample collection existed. Apart from frequent omission of the gender of the patient, there was 96% compliance with all mandatory identifiers of the BCSH guidelines. Practice allowing additions or changes to labelling on sample tubes and request forms varied. 3.2% (14 114/445 726) of samples submitted were rejected for various reasons, the most frequent being incomplete or missing information (49.5% of the total rejected samples). The corrected mean frequency for WBIT in the 27 hospitals with one or more observed WBIT was 1 in 1501 samples (95% CI: < or =1129.09 to < or =1872.91), and the median corrected frequency for WBIT was 1 in 1303 samples. This study has identified great variation in the policy and practice for sample collection for pretransfusion testing. Regular tracking of the rates of sample rejection and WBIT could be used to identify poor performance in individual hospitals requiring investigation and action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15113376     DOI: 10.1111/j.0958-7578.2004.0488.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Med        ISSN: 0958-7578            Impact factor:   2.019


  5 in total

Review 1.  Proceedings of a Consensus Conference: pathogen inactivation-making decisions about new technologies.

Authors:  Kathryn E Webert; Christine M Cserti; Judy Hannon; Yulia Lin; Katerina Pavenski; Jacob M Pendergrast; Morris A Blajchman
Journal:  Transfus Med Rev       Date:  2008-01

2.  The role of comprehensive check at the blood bank reception on blood requisitions in detecting potential transfusion errors.

Authors:  Ashish Jain; Sonam Kumari; Neelam Marwaha; Ratti Ram Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  How useful are delta checks in the 21 century? A stochastic-dynamic model of specimen mix-up and detection.

Authors:  Katie Ovens; Christopher Naugler
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2012-02-29

4.  Quality standards and samples in genetic testing.

Authors:  David Ravine; Graeme Suthers
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The practice of venous blood collection among laboratory and non-laboratory professionals working in Ethiopian Government Hospitals: a comparative study.

Authors:  Mulugeta Melkie; Abel Girma; Tsegaye Tsalla
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.