Literature DB >> 15112808

Uranium immobilization by sulfate-reducing biofilms.

Haluk Beyenal1, Rajesh K Sani, Brent M Peyton, Alice C Dohnalkova, James E Amonette, Zbigniew Lewandowski.   

Abstract

Hexavalent uranium [U(VI)] was immobilized using biofilms of the sulfate-reducing bacterium (SRB) Desulfovibrio desulfuricans G20. The biofilms were grown in flat-plate continuous-flow reactors using lactate as the electron donor and sulfate as the electron acceptor. U(VI)was continuously fed into the reactor for 32 weeks at a concentration of 126 microM. During this time, the soluble U(VI) was removed (between 88 and 96% of feed) from solution and immobilized in the biofilms. The dynamics of U immobilization in the sulfate-reducing biofilms were quantified by estimating: (1) microbial activity in the SRB biofilm, defined as the hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production rate and estimated from the H2S concentration profiles measured using microelectrodes across the biofilms; (2) concentration of dissolved U in the solution; and (3) the mass of U precipitated in the biofilm. Results suggest that U was immobilized in the biofilms as a result of two processes: (1) enzymatically and (2) chemically, by reacting with microbially generated H2S. Visual inspection showed that the dissolved sulfide species reacted with U(VI) to produce a black precipitate. Synchrotron-based U L3-edge X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy analysis of U precipitated abiotically by sodium sulfide indicated that U(VI) had been reduced to U(IV). Selected-area electron diffraction pattern and crystallographic analysis of transmission electron microscope lattice-fringe images confirmed the structure of precipitated U as being that of uraninite.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15112808     DOI: 10.1021/es0348703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  12 in total

1.  Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: central elements in heavy metal bioremediation.

Authors:  Arundhati Pal; A K Paul
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 2.461

2.  U(VI) reduction in sulfate-reducing subsurface sediments amended with ethanol or acetate.

Authors:  Brandon J Converse; Tao Wu; Robert H Findlay; Eric E Roden
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Enhanced uranium immobilization and reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms.

Authors:  Dena L Cologgi; Allison M Speers; Blair A Bullard; Shelly D Kelly; Gemma Reguera
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  How sulphate-reducing microorganisms cope with stress: lessons from systems biology.

Authors:  Jizhong Zhou; Qiang He; Christopher L Hemme; Aindrila Mukhopadhyay; Kristina Hillesland; Aifen Zhou; Zhili He; Joy D Van Nostrand; Terry C Hazen; David A Stahl; Judy D Wall; Adam P Arkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Microbial links between sulfate reduction and metal retention in uranium- and heavy metal-contaminated soil.

Authors:  Jana Sitte; Denise M Akob; Christian Kaufmann; Kai Finster; Dipanjan Banerjee; Eva-Maria Burkhardt; Joel E Kostka; Andreas C Scheinost; Georg Büchel; Kirsten Küsel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Optimization of a bioremediation system of soluble uranium based on the biostimulation of an indigenous bacterial community.

Authors:  Maleke Maleke; Peter Williams; Julio Castillo; Elsabe Botes; Abidemi Ojo; Mary DeFlaun; Esta van Heerden
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Bio-enrichment of heavy metals U(VI) in wastewater by protein DSR A.

Authors:  Yangzhen Shu; Jingxi Xie; Conghui Cheng; Luyao Chen; Kexin Guo; Guowen Peng
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.253

8.  Fe(III) reduction and U(VI) immobilization by Paenibacillus sp. strain 300A, isolated from Hanford 300A subsurface sediments.

Authors:  Bulbul Ahmed; Bin Cao; Jeffrey S McLean; Tuba Ica; Alice Dohnalkova; Ozlem Istanbullu; Akin Paksoy; Jim K Fredrickson; Haluk Beyenal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Biofilm shows spatially stratified metabolic responses to contaminant exposure.

Authors:  Bin Cao; Paul D Majors; Bulbul Ahmed; Ryan S Renslow; Crystal P Silvia; Liang Shi; Staffan Kjelleberg; Jim K Fredrickson; Haluk Beyenal
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 5.491

10.  Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of Desulfovibrio vulgaris biofilms: carbon and energy flow contribute to the distinct biofilm growth state.

Authors:  Melinda E Clark; Zhili He; Alyssa M Redding; Marcin P Joachimiak; Jay D Keasling; Jizhong Z Zhou; Adam P Arkin; Aindrila Mukhopadhyay; Matthew W Fields
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.