Literature DB >> 1511220

Expansion of the cortical representation of a specific skin field in primary somatosensory cortex by intracortical microstimulation.

G H Recanzone1, M M Merzenich, H R Dinse.   

Abstract

Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) was applied to a single site in the middle cortical layers (III-IV) in the koniocortical somatosensory fields of sodium pentobarbital-anesthetized rats (Sml) and new world monkeys (area 3b). Low-threshold cutaneous receptive fields were defined in the cortical region surrounding the stimulation site prior to and following 2-6 hr of 5 microA ICMS stimulation. ICMS stimulation did not usually affect the receptive field location, size, or responsiveness to tactile stimulation of neurons at the stimulation site. However, the number of cortical neurons surrounding the stimulation site with a receptive field that overlapped with the ICMS-site receptive field increased in all studied animals, resulting in an enlarged cortical representation of a restricted skin region spanning several hundred microns. The mean size of receptive fields changed in some but not all cases. These results provide evidence that the responses of cortical neurons are subject to change by the introduction of locally coincident inputs into a single location, and demonstrate a capacity for representational plasticity in the neocortex in the absence of peripheral stimulation. These experimental observations are consistent with hypotheses that the cerebral cortex comprises radially oriented populations of neurons that share a common input, and that these inputs are shaped by coincident activity (see Edelman, 1978, 1987; Merzenich, 1987; Merzenich et al., 1990; von der Malsburg and Singer, 1988).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1511220     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/2.3.181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  41 in total

1.  Plasticity of orientation preference maps in the visual cortex of adult cats.

Authors:  Ben Godde; Ralph Leonhardt; Sven M Cords; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Centripetal and centrifugal reorganizations of frequency map of auditory cortex in gerbils.

Authors:  Masashi Sakai; Nobuo Suga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Learning of tactile frequency discrimination in humans.

Authors:  Tanya Imai; Sandra Kamping; Caterina Breitenstein; Christo Pantev; Bernd Lütkenhöner; Stefan Knecht
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Insights into cortical mechanisms of behavior from microstimulation experiments.

Authors:  Mark H Histed; Amy M Ni; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 5.  Experimental design and interpretation of functional neuroimaging studies of cognitive processes.

Authors:  David Caplan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Auditory cortex mapmaking: principles, projections, and plasticity.

Authors:  Christoph E Schreiner; Jeffery A Winer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Embedding a Panoramic Representation of Infrared Light in the Adult Rat Somatosensory Cortex through a Sensory Neuroprosthesis.

Authors:  Konstantin Hartmann; Eric E Thomson; Ivan Zea; Richy Yun; Peter Mullen; Jay Canarick; Albert Huh; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Modulation of auditory processing by cortico-cortical feed-forward and feedback projections.

Authors:  Jie Tang; Nobuo Suga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Receptive field plasticity of area 17 visual cortical neurons of adult rats.

Authors:  Ralph Leonhardt; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Age-related deficits in a forebrain-dependent task, trace-eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Roberto Galvez; Sabrina Cua; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.