Literature DB >> 15112037

Marker-assisted introgression of five QTLs controlling fruit quality traits into three tomato lines revealed interactions between QTLs and genetic backgrounds.

L Lecomte1, P Duffé, M Buret, B Servin, F Hospital, M Causse.   

Abstract

The evaluation of organoleptic quality of tomato fruit requires physical, chemical and sensory analyses, which are expensive and difficult to assess. Therefore, their practical use in phenotypic selection is difficult. In a previous study, the genetic control of several traits related to organoleptic quality of fresh-market tomato fruit was investigated. Five chromosome regions strongly involved in organoleptic quality attributes were then chosen to be introgressed into three different recipient lines through marker-assisted selection. A marker-assisted backcross (MABC) strategy was performed, as all the favorable alleles for quality traits were provided by the same parental tomato line, whose fruit weight (FW) and firmness were much lower than those of the lines commonly used to develop fresh market varieties. Three improved lines were obtained after three backcrossing and two selfing generations. The implementation of the MABC scheme is described. The three improved lines were crossed together and with the recipient lines in a half-diallel mating scheme, and the simultaneous effect of the five quantitative trait locus (QTL) regions was compared in different genetic backgrounds. Significant effects of the introgressed regions and of the genetic backgrounds were shown. Additive effects were detected for soluble solid and reducing sugar content in two genetic backgrounds. A partially dominant effect on titratable acidity was detected in only one genetic background. In contrast, additive to dominant unfavorable effects of the donor alleles were detected for FW and locule number in the three genetic backgrounds. Recessive QTL effects on firmness were only detected in the two firmest genetic backgrounds. Comparison of the hybrids in the half-diallel gave complementary information on the effects of: (1) the alleles at the selected regions, (2) the genetic backgrounds and (3) their interaction. Breeding efficiency strongly varied according to the recipient parent, and significant interactions between QTLs and genetic backgrounds were shown for all of the traits studied. Copyright 2004 Springer-Verlag

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15112037     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-004-1674-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  10 in total

1.  MDM: a program to compute fully informative genotype frequencies in complex breeding schemes.

Authors:  Bertrand Servin; C Dillmann; G Decoux; F Hospital
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

2.  Marker-assisted introgression of favorable alleles at quantitative trait loci between maize elite lines.

Authors:  Agnès Bouchez; Frédéric Hospital; Mathilde Causse; André Gallais; Alain Charcosset
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  QTL analysis of fruit quality in fresh market tomato: a few chromosome regions control the variation of sensory and instrumental traits.

Authors:  M Causse; V Saliba-Colombani; L Lecomte; P Duffé; P Rousselle; M Buret
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.992

4.  Efficiency of RFLP, RAPD, and AFLP markers for the construction of an intraspecific map of the tomato genome.

Authors:  V Saliba-Colombani; M Causse; L Gervais; J Philouze
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.166

5.  Enhancement of Seedling Emergence in Sweet Corn by Marker-Assisted Backcrossing of Beneficial QTL.

Authors:  Gad G. Yousef; John A. Juvik
Journal:  Crop Sci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.319

Review 6.  QTL analysis in plants; where are we now?

Authors:  M J Kearsey; A G Farquhar
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Marker-assisted introgression of quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  F Hospital; A Charcosset
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Comparative sequencing in the genus Lycopersicon. Implications for the evolution of fruit size in the domestication of cultivated tomatoes.

Authors:  T Clint Nesbitt; Steven D Tanksley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Less-than-additive epistatic interactions of quantitative trait loci in tomato.

Authors:  Y Eshed; D Zamir
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon.

Authors:  J C Miller; S D Tanksley
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.699

  10 in total
  29 in total

1.  Protective proteins are differentially expressed in tomato genotypes differing for their tolerance to low-temperature storage.

Authors:  D Page; B Gouble; B Valot; J P Bouchet; C Callot; A Kretzschmar; M Causse; C M C G Renard; M Faurobert
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  Shaping melons: agronomic and genetic characterization of QTLs that modify melon fruit morphology.

Authors:  Iria Fernandez-Silva; Eduard Moreno; Ali Essafi; Mohamed Fergany; Jordi Garcia-Mas; Ana Montserrat Martín-Hernandez; Jose María Alvarez; Antonio J Monforte
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 3.  Selection in backcross programmes.

Authors:  Frédéric Hospital
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Comparison of the observed with the simulated distributions of the parental genome contribution in two marker-assisted backcross programs in rice.

Authors:  Vanessa Prigge; Hans Peter Maurer; David J Mackill; Albrecht E Melchinger; Matthias Frisch
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Challenges for effective marker-assisted selection in plants.

Authors:  Frédéric Hospital
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-10       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  QTL alleles for improved fiber quality from a wild Hawaiian cotton, Gossypium tomentosum.

Authors:  Zhengsheng Zhang; Junkang Rong; Vijay N Waghmare; Peng W Chee; O Lloyd May; Robert J Wright; John R Gannaway; Andrew H Paterson
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Fine mapping of qSB-11(LE), the QTL that confers partial resistance to rice sheath blight.

Authors:  Shimin Zuo; Yuejun Yin; Cunhong Pan; Zongxiang Chen; Yafang Zhang; Shiliang Gu; Lihuang Zhu; Xuebiao Pan
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Isolation and functional characterisation of banana phytoene synthase genes as potential cisgenes.

Authors:  Bulukani Mlalazi; Ralf Welsch; Priver Namanya; Harjeet Khanna; R Jason Geijskes; Mark D Harrison; Rob Harding; James L Dale; Marion Bateson
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 4.116

9.  Validation and fine mapping of lyc12.1, a QTL for increased tomato fruit lycopene content.

Authors:  Matthew P Kinkade; Majid R Foolad
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  QTL analysis reveals context-dependent loci for seed glucosinolate trait in the oilseed Brassica juncea: importance of recurrent selection backcross scheme for the identification of 'true' QTL.

Authors:  N Ramchiary; N C Bisht; V Gupta; A Mukhopadhyay; N Arumugam; Y S Sodhi; D Pental; A K Pradhan
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.