Literature DB >> 15111902

Total elbow arthroplasty with massive composite allografts.

Kevin J Renfree1, Paul C Dell, Scott H Kozin, Thomas W Wright.   

Abstract

Total elbow arthroplasty is challenging when there is extensive bone loss. We studied retrospectively the long-term (mean, 6.5 years) clinical and radiographic results of 10 patients in whom 14 massive allograft-prosthetic composites were used in such clinical situations. The mean arc of active flexion/extension was 92 degrees. The Bryan-Morrey and Hospital for Special Surgery elbow scoring systems were used and revealed a modest improvement in pain and stability but a disappointing return of function, with independent self-care possible in only 3 patients, household and employment activities in 2, and recreational pursuits in 2. Three patients claimed that they were unable to use the elbow. Multiple procedures (mean, 2.2) were sometimes required to optimize the result. The 79% rate of allograft-host union is similar to that of hip and knee arthroplasty. The use of massive allografts is a reasonable alternative in salvage situations involving total elbow arthroplasty with massive bone loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15111902     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  10 in total

Review 1.  Megaprosthesis versus Allograft Prosthesis Composite for massive skeletal defects.

Authors:  Deepak Gautam; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-09-25

2.  [Modular tumor prostheses of the humerus].

Authors:  P T Funovics; M Dominkus
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Clinical results of revision total elbow arthroplasty: comparison of infected and non-infected total elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jae-Man Kwak; Erica Kholinne; Yucheng Sun; Myung-Sun Kim; Kyoung-Hwan Koh; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  There is a role for allografts in reconstructive surgery of the elbow and forearm.

Authors:  R J Molenaars; B J A Schoolmeesters; J Viveen; B The; D Eygendaal
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Impaction Grafting in Revision Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Aseptic Loosening and Bone Loss: Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Yong Girl Rhee; Nam Su Cho; Chong Suck Parke
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2013-09-11

6.  Interprosthetic humeral fracture revision using a tibial allograft total elbow prosthetic composite in a patient with hemophilia A : a case report.

Authors:  Justin Leblanc; Shannon Puloski; Kevin Hildebrand
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2012-09-25

7.  Reconstruction of large bone defect using autogenous fibular strut and iliac bone graft for revision total elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yoon Min Lee; Soo Hun Son; Yoo Joon Sur; Seok Whan Song
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Total Humeral Endoprosthetic Replacement following Excision of Malignant Bone Tumors.

Authors:  Suhel Kotwal; Bryan Moon; Patrick Lin; Robert Satcher; Valerae Lewis
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2016-02-21

9.  Compressive osseointegration endoprosthesis for massive bone loss in the upper extremity: surgical technique.

Authors:  Steven J Hattrup; Krista A Goulding; Christopher P Beauchamp
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2018-02-01

Review 10.  Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Revision Surgery.

Authors:  Jae-Man Kwak; Kyoung-Hwan Koh; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.