Literature DB >> 15111633

The frictional coefficient of the temporomandibular joint and its dependency on the magnitude and duration of joint loading.

E Tanaka1, N Kawai, M Tanaka, M Todoh, T van Eijden, K Hanaoka, D A Dalla-Bona, T Takata, K Tanne.   

Abstract

In synovial joints, friction between articular surfaces leads to shear stress within the cartilaginous tissue, which might result in tissue rupture and failure. Joint friction depends on synovial lubrication of the articular surfaces, which can be altered due to compressive loading. Therefore, we hypothesized that the frictional coefficient of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is affected by the magnitude and duration of loading. We tested this by measuring the frictional coefficient in 20 intact porcine TMJs using a pendulum-type friction tester. The mean frictional coefficient was 0.0145 (SD 0.0027) after a constant loading of 50 N during 5 sec. The frictional coefficient increased with the length of the preceding loading duration and exceeded 0.0220 (SD 0.0014) after 1 hr. Application of larger loading (80 N) resulted in significantly larger frictional coefficients. In conclusion, the frictional coefficient in the TMJ was proportional to the magnitude and duration of joint loading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15111633     DOI: 10.1177/154405910408300510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  11 in total

1.  Frictional properties of Hartley guinea pig knees with and without proteolytic disruption of the articular surfaces.

Authors:  E Teeple; B C Fleming; A P Mechrefe; J J Crisco; M F Brady; G D Jay
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Role of interstitial fluid pressurization in TMJ lubrication.

Authors:  B K Zimmerman; E D Bonnevie; M Park; Y Zhou; L Wang; D L Burris; X L Lu
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Effects of enzymatic degradation after loading in temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  Y Asakawa-Tanne; S Su; R Kunimatsu; N Hirose; T Mitsuyoshi; Y Okamoto; E Tanaka; K Tanne; K Tanimoto
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Static and dynamic mechanics of the temporomandibular joint: plowing forces, joint load and tissue stress.

Authors:  J Nickel; R Spilker; L Iwasaki; Y Gonzalez; W D McCall; R Ohrbach; M W Beatty; D Marx
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Comparison of two methods for calculating the frictional properties of articular cartilage using a simple pendulum and intact mouse knee joints.

Authors:  Elizabeth I Drewniak; Gregory D Jay; Braden C Fleming; Joseph J Crisco
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Pendulum mass affects the measurement of articular friction coefficient.

Authors:  Matthew R Akelman; Erin Teeple; Jason T Machan; Joseph J Crisco; Gregory D Jay; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  Gliding resistance and modifications of gliding surface of tendon: clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Peter C Amadio
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 1.907

8.  Tractional Forces, Work and Energy Densities in the Human TMJ.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Nickel; Laura R Iwasaki; Luigi M Gallo; Sandro Palla; David B Marx
Journal:  Craniofac Growth Ser       Date:  2009-03

9.  Association between Peanut Consumption and Temporomandibular Disorders in a Sample of the South Korean Population.

Authors:  Hyungkil Choi; Jeong-Woo Lee; Kyoung-In Yun
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.429

10.  A study of the temporomandibular joint during bruxism.

Authors:  María S Commisso; Javier Martínez-Reina; Juana Mayo
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 6.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.