Literature DB >> 15111616

Spatial vision deficits in infants and children with Down syndrome.

Ffion M John1, Nathan R Bromham, J Margaret Woodhouse, T Rowan Candy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Infants and children with Down syndrome show reduced visual acuity and contrast sensitivity when tested with conventional behavioral techniques. These results may reflect sensory deficits of optical or neural origin or a loss of performance in mechanisms responsible for generating the behavioral response. The purpose of this study was to compare objective acuity and contrast sensitivity measurements recorded with visual-evoked potentials (VEPs), with behavioral clinical test results in a group of children with Down syndrome and a group of control subjects. The goal was to determine whether children with Down syndrome still have a sensory deficit when tested using a procedure that is less cognitively demanding than conventional tests.
METHODS: The subject group comprised 58 children with Down syndrome and 44 control subjects, aged 3 months to 14.15 years. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were measured with steady state, swept VEPs and behavioral techniques. VEP acuity was obtained from 36 children with Down syndrome and 40 control subjects, and behavioral acuity from 54 children with Down syndrome and 35 control subjects. VEP contrast sensitivity was measured in 24 children with Down syndrome and 34 control subjects, and behavioral contrast sensitivity in 42 children with Down syndrome and 25 control subjects. Group differences in visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were analyzed with an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with age as a covariate.
RESULTS: Visual acuity thresholds were significantly lower in the group with Down syndrome than in the control group. This was true for both VEP (P < 0.01) and behavioral measures (P < 0.01). The Down syndrome group also had reduced contrast sensitivity when compared with the control subjects, for VEP contrast sensitivity (P < 0.01) and behavioral contrast sensitivity (P < 0.01). The group differences remained when children with ophthalmic anomalies were excluded from the analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: The reduced visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in the Down syndrome group support the idea of an underlying sensory deficit in the visual system in Down syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15111616     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-0951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  24 in total

1.  Static and dynamic measurements of accommodation in individuals with down syndrome.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Ruth E Manny; Adrian Glasser; Karla K Stuebing
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The Down syndrome critical region regulates retinogeniculate refinement.

Authors:  Martina Blank; Peter G Fuerst; Beth Stevens; Navid Nouri; Lowry Kirkby; Deepti Warrier; Ben A Barres; Marla B Feller; Andrew D Huberman; Robert W Burgess; Craig C Garner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Comparison of Whole Eye versus First-Surface Astigmatism in Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Rachel Knowlton; Jason D Marsack; Norman E Leach; Ralph J Herring; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Simulated Keratometry Repeatability in Subjects with and without Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Julia S Benoit; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Variability in Objective Refraction for Persons with Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Julia S Benoit; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Macular structural characteristics in children with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Scott O'Brien; Jingyun Wang; Heather A Smith; Dana L Donaldson; Kathryn M Haider; Gavin J Roberts; Derek T Sprunger; Daniel E Neely; David A Plager
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Effects of sweep VEP parameters on visual acuity and contrast thresholds in children and adults.

Authors:  Fahad M Almoqbel; Naveen K Yadav; Susan J Leat; Liseann M Head; Elizabeth L Irving
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  The mouse model of Down syndrome Ts65Dn presents visual deficits as assessed by pattern visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Jonah Jacob Scott-McKean; Bo Chang; Ronald E Hurd; Steven Nusinowitz; Cecilia Schmidt; Muriel T Davisson; Alberto C S Costa
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 9.  VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich; Michael B Hoffmann; J Vernon Odom; Daphne L McCulloch; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 10.  Syndromes of hearing loss associated with visual loss.

Authors:  Kamal Ahmed Abou-Elhamd; Hesham Mohamed ElToukhy; Fahad Abdullah Al-Wadaani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.