OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular fitness (VO(2max)) and physical activity are both related to risk of metabolic disease. It is unclear, however, whether the metabolic effects of sedentary living are the same in fit and unfit individuals. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to describe the association between physical activity and the metabolic syndrome and to test whether fitness level modifies this relationship. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Physical activity was measured objectively using individually calibrated heart rate against energy expenditure. VO(2max) was predicted from a submaximal exercise stress test. Fat mass and fat-free mass (FFM) were calculated using impedance biometry. A metabolic syndrome score was computed by summing the standardized values for obesity, hypertension, hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia, and the inverse level of HDL cholesterol and was expressed as a continuously distributed outcome. To correct for exposure measurement error, a random subsample (22% of cohort) re-attended for three repeat measurements in the year following the first assessment. RESULTS: The relationship of VO(2max) (ml O2.kg(FFM)(-1).min(-1)) and the metabolic syndrome score was of borderline significance after adjusting for age, sex, physical activity, and measurement error (beta = -0.58, P = 0.06). The magnitude of the association between physical activity (kJ.d(-1).kg(FFM)(-1)) and the metabolic syndrome was more than three times greater than for VO(2max) (standardized beta = -1.83, P = 0.0042). VO(2max), however, modified the relationship between physical activity energy expenditure and metabolic syndrome (P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a strong inverse association between physical activity and metabolic syndrome, an association that is much steeper in unfit individuals. Thus, prevention of metabolic disease may be most effective in the subset of unfit inactive people.
OBJECTIVE:Cardiovascular fitness (VO(2max)) and physical activity are both related to risk of metabolic disease. It is unclear, however, whether the metabolic effects of sedentary living are the same in fit and unfit individuals. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to describe the association between physical activity and the metabolic syndrome and to test whether fitness level modifies this relationship. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Physical activity was measured objectively using individually calibrated heart rate against energy expenditure. VO(2max) was predicted from a submaximal exercise stress test. Fat mass and fat-free mass (FFM) were calculated using impedance biometry. A metabolic syndrome score was computed by summing the standardized values for obesity, hypertension, hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia, and the inverse level of HDL cholesterol and was expressed as a continuously distributed outcome. To correct for exposure measurement error, a random subsample (22% of cohort) re-attended for three repeat measurements in the year following the first assessment. RESULTS: The relationship of VO(2max) (ml O2.kg(FFM)(-1).min(-1)) and the metabolic syndrome score was of borderline significance after adjusting for age, sex, physical activity, and measurement error (beta = -0.58, P = 0.06). The magnitude of the association between physical activity (kJ.d(-1).kg(FFM)(-1)) and the metabolic syndrome was more than three times greater than for VO(2max) (standardized beta = -1.83, P = 0.0042). VO(2max), however, modified the relationship between physical activity energy expenditure and metabolic syndrome (P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a strong inverse association between physical activity and metabolic syndrome, an association that is much steeper in unfit individuals. Thus, prevention of metabolic disease may be most effective in the subset of unfit inactive people.
Authors: A Jonsson; F Renström; V Lyssenko; E C Brito; B Isomaa; G Berglund; P M Nilsson; L Groop; P W Franks Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2009-04-17 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Steven K Malin; Stephen Finnegan; Ciaran E Fealy; Julianne Filion; Michael B Rocco; John P Kirwan Journal: Metab Syndr Relat Disord Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 1.894
Authors: F M Finucane; S J Sharp; L R Purslow; K Horton; J Horton; D B Savage; S Brage; H Besson; E De Lucia Rolfe; A Sleigh; H J Martin; A Aihie Sayer; C Cooper; U Ekelund; S J Griffin; N J Wareham Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Rebecca K Simmons; Esther Mf van Sluijs; Wendy Hardeman; Stephen Sutton; Simon J Griffin Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-04-30 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Clare Vaughan; Adrian Schoo; Edward D Janus; Benjamin Philpot; Nathalie Davis-Lameloise; Sing Kai Lo; Tiina Laatikainen; Erkki Vartiainen; James A Dunbar Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-07-31 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Pablo Méndez-Hernández; Yvonne Flores; Carole Siani; Michel Lamure; L Darina Dosamantes-Carrasco; Elizabeth Halley-Castillo; Gerardo Huitrón; Juan O Talavera; Katia Gallegos-Carrillo; Jorge Salmerón Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-07-31 Impact factor: 3.295