Literature DB >> 15111402

Gating of the large mechanosensitive channel in situ: estimation of the spatial scale of the transition from channel population responses.

Chien-Sung Chiang1, Andriy Anishkin, Sergei Sukharev.   

Abstract

Physical expansion associated with the opening of a tension-sensitive channel has the same meaning as gating charge for a voltage-gated channel. Despite increasing evidence for the open-state conformation of MscL, the energetic description of its complex gating remains incomplete. The previously estimated in-plane expansion of MscL is considerably smaller than predicted by molecular models. To resolve this discrepancy, we conducted a systematic study of currents and dose-response curves for wild-type MscL in Escherichia coli giant spheroplasts. Using the all-point histogram method and calibrating tension against the threshold for the small mechanosensitive channel (MscS) in each patch, we found that the distribution of channels among the subconducting states is significantly less dependent on tension than the distribution between the closed and conducting states. At -20 mV, all substates together occupy approximately 30% of the open time and reduce the mean integral current by approximately 6%, essentially independent of tension or P(o). This is consistent with the gating scheme in which the major rate-limiting step is the transition between the closed state and a low-conducting substate, and validates both the use of the integral current as a measure of P(o), and treatment of dose-response curves in the two-state approximation. The apparent energy and area differences between the states deltaE and deltaA, extracted from 29 independent dose-response curves, varied in a linearly correlated manner whereas the midpoint tension stayed at approximately 10.4 mN/m. Statistical modeling suggests slight variability of gating parameters among channels in each patch, causing a strong reduction and correlated spread of apparent deltaE and deltaA. The slope of initial parts of activation curves, with a few channels being active, gave estimates of deltaE = 51 +/- 13 kT and deltaA = 20.4 +/- 4.8 nm(2), the latter being consistent with structural models of MscL, which predict deltaA = 23 nm(2).

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Cell Biology; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15111402      PMCID: PMC1304154          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74337-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  28 in total

1.  Stretch-sensitive switching among different channel sublevels of an endothelial cation channel.

Authors:  X Yao; H Kwan; Y Huang
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2001-04-02

Review 2.  The voltage sensor in voltage-dependent ion channels.

Authors:  F Bezanilla
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  The gating mechanism of the large mechanosensitive channel MscL.

Authors:  S Sukharev; M Betanzos; C S Chiang; H R Guy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-08       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Structural models of the MscL gating mechanism.

Authors:  S Sukharev; S R Durell; H R Guy
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Conformational pathways in the gating of Escherichia coli mechanosensitive channel.

Authors:  Yifei Kong; Yufeng Shen; Tiffany E Warth; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The single-channel dose-response relation is consistently steep for rod cyclic nucleotide-gated channels: implications for the interpretation of macroscopic dose-response relations.

Authors:  M Ruiz; R L Brown; Y He; T L Haley; J W Karpen
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-08-17       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Structure of the MscL homolog from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a gated mechanosensitive ion channel.

Authors:  G Chang; R H Spencer; A T Lee; M T Barclay; D C Rees
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-12-18       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Energetic and spatial parameters for gating of the bacterial large conductance mechanosensitive channel, MscL.

Authors:  S I Sukharev; W J Sigurdson; C Kung; F Sachs
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 9.  Managing hypoosmotic stress: aquaporins and mechanosensitive channels in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  I R Booth; P Louis
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.934

10.  Purification of the small mechanosensitive channel of Escherichia coli (MscS): the subunit structure, conduction, and gating characteristics in liposomes.

Authors:  Sergei Sukharev
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  53 in total

1.  Effects of GsMTx4 on bacterial mechanosensitive channels in inside-out patches from giant spheroplasts.

Authors:  Kishore Kamaraju; Philip A Gottlieb; Frederick Sachs; Sergei Sukharev
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Hidden Markov analysis of improved bandwidth mechanosensitive ion channel data.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Almanjahie; R Nazim Khan; Robin K Milne; Takeshi Nomura; Boris Martinac
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 1.733

3.  Cloning and functional expression of an MscL ortholog from Rhizobium etli: characterization of a mechanosensitive channel.

Authors:  Daniel Balleza; Froylan Gómez-Lagunas; Carmen Quinto
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 1.843

Review 4.  Mechanosensitive channels: what can they do and how do they do it?

Authors:  Elizabeth S Haswell; Rob Phillips; Douglas C Rees
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Desensitization of mechano-gated K2P channels.

Authors:  Eric Honoré; Amanda Jane Patel; Jean Chemin; Thomas Suchyna; Frederick Sachs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Mechanosensitive ion channels and the peptide inhibitor GsMTx-4: history, properties, mechanisms and pharmacology.

Authors:  Charles L Bowman; Philip A Gottlieb; Thomas M Suchyna; Yolanda K Murphy; Frederick Sachs
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 3.033

7.  A finite element framework for studying the mechanical response of macromolecules: application to the gating of the mechanosensitive channel MscL.

Authors:  Yuye Tang; Guoxin Cao; Xi Chen; Jejoong Yoo; Arun Yethiraj; Qiang Cui
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Molecular evolution of the vertebrate mechanosensory cell and ear.

Authors:  Bernd Fritzsch; Kirk W Beisel; Sarah Pauley; Garrett Soukup
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.203

Review 9.  State-stabilizing Interactions in Bacterial Mechanosensitive Channel Gating and Adaptation.

Authors:  Andriy Anishkin; Sergei Sukharev
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Human PIEZO1: removing inactivation.

Authors:  Chilman Bae; Philip A Gottlieb; Frederick Sachs
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.