Literature DB >> 15110417

Socioeconomic differences in cancer screening participation: comparing cognitive and psychosocial explanations.

Jane Wardle1, Kirsten McCaffery, Marion Nadel, Wendy Atkin.   

Abstract

This paper compares psychosocial and cognitive models of socioeconomic variation in participation in screening for colorectal cancer. The psychosocial model suggests that factors such as higher stress and lower social support explain, in part, why people from lower socioeconomic status (SES) environments are less likely to participate in screening. The cognitive model suggests that beliefs about cancer risk and screening will play an important part in differential participation. In practice both sets of factors may contribute to explaining socioeconomic differentials. The data for these analyses are drawn from a randomised controlled trial of colorectal cancer screening (the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Trial). The participants are from the Scottish centre, where recruitment was stratified to generate a socioeconomically diverse sample. The dependent variable was interest in attending screening. A questionnaire covering demographic status, psychosocial and cognitive factors as well as interest in screening was sent to 10,650 adults. The results showed the predicted SES gradient in interest. There were also SES differences in both psychosocial and cognitive variables. A series of logistic regression models were used to test potential mediators of the association between SES and interest in attending screening by successively including psychosocial factors, cognitive factors, and then both, in the equation. Only the inclusion of the cognitive variables significantly reduced the variation associated with SES, providing better support for the cognitive than the psychosocial model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15110417     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  50 in total

1.  Cancer fatalism and poor self-rated health mediate the association between socioeconomic status and uptake of colorectal cancer screening in England.

Authors:  Anne Miles; Sandra Rainbow; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Socioeconomic disparities in optimism and pessimism.

Authors:  Kathryn A Robb; Alice E Simon; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2009

3.  Mediating factors in the relationship between income and mammography use in low-income insured women.

Authors:  Alice N Park; Diana S M Buist; Jasmin A Tiro; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Complicating "the good result": narratives of colorectal cancer screening when cancer is not found.

Authors:  Jean M Hunleth; Robert Gallo; Emily K Steinmetz; Aimee S James
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2019-02-04

5.  Differences in colorectal cancer screening rates across income strata by levels of urbanization: results from the Canadian Community Health Survey (2013/2014).

Authors:  Jonathan Simkin; Gina Ogilvie; Brendan Hanley; Catherine Elliott
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2018-10-23

6.  Socio-demographic Moderators of Associations Between Psychological Factors and Latinas' Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors.

Authors:  L G Perez; J P Elder; J Haughton; M E Martinez; E M Arredondo
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2018-08

7.  Perspectives of colorectal cancer risk and screening among Dominicans and Puerto Ricans: stigma and misperceptions.

Authors:  Roberta E Goldman; Joseph A Diaz; Ivone Kim
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2009-09-23

8.  Socio-demographic disparity in oral health among the poor: a cross sectional study of early adolescents in Kilwa district, Tanzania.

Authors:  Kijakazi O Mashoto; Anne N Astrom; Marit S Skeie; Joyce R Masalu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation in the first round of the national screening programme in England.

Authors:  C von Wagner; A Good; D Wright; B Rachet; A Obichere; S Bloom; J Wardle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Factors affecting attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening in the primary care population.

Authors:  T Taskila; S Wilson; S Damery; A Roalfe; V Redman; T Ismail; R Hobbs
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.