Literature DB >> 15110132

A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial to assess the efficacy and tolerability of rofecoxib, diclofenac sodium, and meloxicam in patients with acute gouty arthritis.

Tien-Tsai Cheng1, Han-Ming Lai, Chun-Kai Chiu, Ying-Chou Chem.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute attacks of gouty arthritis are characterized by the rapid onset of severe pain, swelling, and erythema of the affected joint. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are considered the drugs of first choice for treating acute gout. Rofecoxib is a specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, which has demonstrated analgesic efficacy in the setting of acute pain. Whether it is effective in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis remains to be evaluated.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of rofecoxib compared with diclofenac sodium sustained release (SR) and meloxicam in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis.
METHODS: In this single-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel-group study, patients aged > or =18 years with acute gout within 48 hours of onset were randomized to receive oral treatment with 2 tablets of rofecoxib (25 mg), diclofenac (75 mg), or meloxicam (7.5 mg) once daily for 7 days. The primary outcome measures were patients global assessment of response to therapy and investigator assessment of response to therapy on days 3 and 8. Other efficacy measurements included investigator assessment of total inflammatory scores on days 3 and 8 and patient assessment of pain intensity during the first 12 hours of treatment.
RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (53 men, 9 women; mean [SD] age, 51.1 [12.1] years) were assigned to receive rofexocib (n = 20), diclofenac (n = 21), or meloxicam (n = 21). For patient global response to therapy on days 3 and 8, rofecoxib was associated with analgesic efficacy in significantly more patients compared with meloxicam (84.2% vs 40.0% of patients [ P=0.005] and 94.7% vs 60.0% of patients [ P=0.02], respectively); no significant differences versus diclofenac were found. Similarly, for investigator global assessment of response to therapy, a greater percentage of responders was found in the rofecoxib group compared with the meloxicam group on day 3 (88.9% vs 40.0% of patients [ P=0.02 ]), but the difference was not significant on day 8. A greater percentage of responders was found in the rofecoxib group compared with the diclofenac group on day 3 (88.9% vs 47.3% [ P=0.007 ]), but the difference was not significant on day 8. Compared with baseline, all regimens showed significant improvement in total inflammatory scores on days 3 and 8 (all P<0.01 ). During the first 12 hours after dosing, pain intensity score was significantly reduced with rofecoxib starting at 0.5 hours ( P<0.05 ), but not with diclofenac or meloxicam. Clinical adverse events (AEs) were reported in 4 (20.0%), 7 (33.3%), and 6 (28.6%) patients in the rofecoxib, diclofenac, and meloxicam groups, respectively; the most common AEs reported were edema in 1 patient each in the rofecoxib (5.0%) and meloxicam (4.8%) groups and 2 patients (9.5%) in the diclofenac group and abdominal (1 [5.0%], 1 [4.8%], and 2 [9.5%], respectively). No significant differences in tolerability were found among the 3 treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with acute gouty arthritis, rofecoxib 50 mg once daily provided more effective treatment than diclofenac sodium SR 150 mg and meloxicam 15 mg administered orally once daily for 7 days in > or = 1 efficacy assessment of overall analgesic effect on day 3 or day 8. Rofecoxib achieved a rapid onset of pain relief, demonstrating significant improvement 30 minutes after dosing. All of the regimens appeared well tolerated in the population studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15110132     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90035-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  13 in total

Review 1.  Gout in solid organ transplantation: a challenging clinical problem.

Authors:  Lisa Stamp; Martin Searle; John O'Donnell; Peter Chapman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Diagnosis and management of gout: a rational approach.

Authors:  E Suresh
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Taking the stress out of managing gout.

Authors:  Tessa Laubscher; Zack Dumont; Loren Regier; Brent Jensen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Gout.

Authors:  Martin Underwood
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-05-17

Review 5.  Gout.

Authors:  Martin Underwood
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-03-19

Review 6.  Outcome measures in acute gout: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Nicola Dalbeth; Cathy S Zhong; Rebecca Grainger; Dinesh Khanna; Puja P Khanna; Jasvinder A Singh; Fiona M McQueen; William J Taylor
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Comparison of preemptive analgesic effects of a single dose of nonopioid analgesics for pain management after ambulatory surgery: A prospective, randomized, single-blind studyin Turkish patients.

Authors:  Mesut Sener; Zafer Ozgur Pektas; Ismail Yilmaz; Ayda Turkoz; Sina Uckan; Asli Donmez; Gulnaz Arslan
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2005-11

Review 8.  EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part II: Management. Report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT).

Authors:  W Zhang; M Doherty; T Bardin; E Pascual; V Barskova; P Conaghan; J Gerster; J Jacobs; B Leeb; F Lioté; G McCarthy; P Netter; G Nuki; F Perez-Ruiz; A Pignone; J Pimentão; L Punzi; E Roddy; T Uhlig; I Zimmermann-Gòrska
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  Gout.

Authors:  Martin Underwood
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-11-17

10.  Canakinumab relieves symptoms of acute flares and improves health-related quality of life in patients with difficult-to-treat Gouty Arthritis by suppressing inflammation: results of a randomized, dose-ranging study.

Authors:  Naomi Schlesinger; Marc De Meulemeester; Andrey Pikhlak; A Eftal Yücel; Dominik Richard; Valda Murphy; Udayasankar Arulmani; Peter Sallstig; Alexander So
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.