Literature DB >> 15110118

The importance of cleaning for the overall results of processing endoscopes.

H Martiny1, H Floss, B Zühlsdorf.   

Abstract

Reprocessing comprises three steps: cleaning, disinfection and-if required-sterilisation. While the extents of disinfection and of sterilisation are quantitatively defined, there are only imprecise (qualitative) definitions of cleaning. There are two main reasons for accurate cleaning. First organic and inorganic materials that remain on inner and outer surfaces will interfere with the efficacy of the disinfectants. In case of endoscopes this will lead to channel blockages; they remain undisinfected. Second the bioburden found on endoscopes after use can be very high. Data available demonstrate that a bacterial burden of up to 10(9)cfu/endoscope channel can be expected. Therefore it is necessary to perform a thorough cleaning. Studies using endoscopes showed a reduction in microbial counts by a factor of approximately 10(4) by cleaning (manual and mechanical). Therefore in 2001 the German Society of Hospital Hygiene (DGKH) specified its requirements and recommendations for determining cleaning efficacy separately from those for disinfection. Cleaning and disinfecting can be done manually or mechanically, but it seems impossible to validate manual processes. However our studies in two different washer-disinfectors (WD) showed differences in cleaning efficacy. The tested cleaning processes showed different efficacies. Not all cleaning processes showed better results than water alone with regard to visible cleanliness and to a microbiological reduction E. faecium. Our results show that the evaluation of cleanliness exclusively by visible inspection is not sufficient, particular for the lumens of endoscopes. The results also show that a cleaning process may be very effective also in reducing micro-organisms present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15110118     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  5 in total

Review 1.  Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Patricia M Fliss; Heike Martiny
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

2.  Effective reprocessing of reusable dispensers for surface disinfection tissues - the devil is in the details.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Stina Degenhardt; Sibylle Lackner; Christiane Ostermeyer
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2014-03-07

3.  Plasma-activated water: a new and effective alternative for duodenoscope reprocessing.

Authors:  Gheorghe G Bălan; Irina Roşca; Elena-Laura Ursu; Florica Doroftei; Andra-Cristina Bostănaru; Eugen Hnatiuc; Valentin Năstasă; Vasile Şandru; Gabriela Ştefănescu; Anca Trifan; Mihai Mareş
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Efficacy of various disinfectants against SARS coronavirus.

Authors:  H F Rabenau; G Kampf; J Cinatl; H W Doerr
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Microbiological Surveillance of Endoscopes in a Southern Italian Transplantation Hospital: A Retrospective Study from 2016 to 2019.

Authors:  Valentina Marchese; Daniele Di Carlo; Gaetano Fazio; Santi Mauro Gioè; Angelo Luca; Rossella Alduino; Monica Rizzo; Fabio Tuzzolino; Francesco Monaco; Pier Giulio Conaldi; Bruno Douradinha; Giuseppina Di Martino
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.