Literature DB >> 15110022

Geometrical interpretation of fMRI-guided MEG/EEG inverse estimates.

Seppo P Ahlfors1, Gregory V Simpson.   

Abstract

Magneto- and electroencephalography (MEG/EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) provide complementary information about the functional organization of the human brain. An important advantage of MEG/EEG is the millisecond time resolution in detecting electrical activity in the cerebral cortex. The interpretation of MEG/EEG signals, however, is limited by the difficulty of determining the spatial distribution of the neural activity. Functional MRI can help in the MEG/EEG source analysis by suggesting likely locations of activity. We present a geometric interpretation of fMRI-guided inverse solutions in which the MEG/EEG source estimate minimizes a distance to a subspace defined by the fMRI data. In this subspace regularization (SSR) approach, the fMRI bias does not assume preferred amplitudes for MEG/EEG sources, only locations. Characteristic dependence of the source estimates on the regularization parameters is illustrated with simulations. When the fMRI locations match the true MEG/EEG source locations, they serve to bias the underdetermined MEG/EEG inverse solution toward the fMRI loci. Importantly, when the fMRI loci do not match the true MEG/EEG loci, the solution is insensitive to those fMRI loci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15110022     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  18 in total

1.  Increasing the accuracy of electromagnetic inverses using functional area source correlation constraints.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Justin M Ales; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Effects of fMRI-EEG mismatches in cortical current density estimation integrating fMRI and EEG: a simulation study.

Authors:  Zhongming Liu; Fedja Kecman; Bin He
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Dealing with mismatched fMRI activations in fMRI constrained EEG cortical source imaging: a simulation study assuming various mismatch types.

Authors:  Chang-Hwan Im
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  fMRI-EEG integrated cortical source imaging by use of time-variant spatial constraints.

Authors:  Zhongming Liu; Bin He
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Comparing MEG and fMRI views to naming actions and objects.

Authors:  Mia Liljeström; Annika Hultén; Lauri Parkkonen; Riitta Salmelin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  BOLD responses in human auditory cortex are more closely related to transient MEG responses than to sustained ones.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Matti S Hämäläinen; Jennifer R Melcher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Multimodal functional imaging using fMRI-informed regional EEG/MEG source estimation.

Authors:  Wanmei Ou; Aapo Nummenmaa; Jyrki Ahveninen; John W Belliveau; Matti S Hämäläinen; Polina Golland
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Multimodal functional imaging using fMRI-informed regional EEG/MEG source estimation.

Authors:  Wanmei Ou; Aapo Nummenmaa; Polina Golland; Matti S Hamalainen
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

9.  Multimodal functional imaging using fMRI-informed regional EEG/MEG source estimation.

Authors:  Wanmei Oun; Aapo Numënmaa; Matti Hämäläinen; Polina Golland
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2009

10.  Adding dynamics to the Human Connectome Project with MEG.

Authors:  L J Larson-Prior; R Oostenveld; S Della Penna; G Michalareas; F Prior; A Babajani-Feremi; J-M Schoffelen; L Marzetti; F de Pasquale; F Di Pompeo; J Stout; M Woolrich; Q Luo; R Bucholz; P Fries; V Pizzella; G L Romani; M Corbetta; A Z Snyder
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.