Literature DB >> 15110006

Retrieval of abstract semantics.

Uta Noppeney1, Cathy J Price.   

Abstract

Behavioural and neuropsychological evidence suggests that abstract and concrete concepts might be represented, retrieved and processed differently in the human brain. Using fMRI, we demonstrate that retrieval of abstract relative to sensory-based semantics during synonym judgements increased activation in a left frontotemporal system that has been associated with semantic processing particularly at the sentence level. Since activation increases were observed irrespective of the degree of difficulty, we suggest that these differential activations might reflect a particular retrieval mechanism or strategy for abstract concepts. In contrast to sensory-based semantics, the meaning of abstract concepts is largely specified by their usage in language rather than by their relations to the physical world. Subjects might therefore generate an appropriate semantic sentential context to fully explore and specify the meaning of abstract concepts. Our results also explain why abstract semantics is vulnerable to left frontotemporal lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15110006     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  66 in total

1.  Neural dichotomy of word concreteness: a view from functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  Uttam Kumar
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09-26

2.  Accessing the mental space-Spatial working memory processes for language and vision overlap in precuneus.

Authors:  Mikkel Wallentin; Ethan Weed; Leif Østergaard; Kim Mouridsen; Andreas Roepstorff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Julie A Conder; David N Blitzer; Svetlana V Shinkareva
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Activation of sensory-motor areas in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Rutvik H Desai; Jeffrey R Binder; Lisa L Conant; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Abstract Conceptual Feature Ratings Predict Gaze Within Written Word Arrays: Evidence From a Visual Wor(l)d Paradigm.

Authors:  Silvia Primativo; Jamie Reilly; Sebastian J Crutch
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-02-22

6.  Sensory and semantic category subdivisions within the anterior temporal lobes.

Authors:  Laura M Skipper; Lars A Ross; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Semantic memory: distinct neural representations for abstractness and valence.

Authors:  Laura M Skipper; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Brain function overlaps when people observe emblems, speech, and grasping.

Authors:  Michael Andric; Ana Solodkin; Giovanni Buccino; Susan Goldin-Meadow; Giacomo Rizzolatti; Steven L Small
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Neuronal activation for semantically reversible sentences.

Authors:  Fiona M Richardson; Michael S C Thomas; Cathy J Price
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  The role of the anterior temporal lobes in the comprehension of concrete and abstract words: rTMS evidence.

Authors:  Gorana Pobric; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Elizabeth Jefferies
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.