Literature DB >> 15109905

Hormonal status and test condition, but not sexual experience, modulate partner preference in female rats.

Ann S Clark1, Megan C Kelton, Fay A Guarraci, Erika Q Clyons.   

Abstract

A series of experiments was conducted to determine the contributions of hormonal status, test condition, and sexual experience to the display of partner preference by female rats. Preference for a sexually active male rat over a sexually receptive female rat was assessed in independent groups of female rats tested in a condition limiting physical contact (No Contact) and a condition allowing for sexual interaction (Contact). Although hormonal status and test condition influenced the preference for a sexually active male, repeated testing and sexual experience had no effect. Experiment 1 demonstrated that independent of test condition, preference for the male is stronger in estrogen- and progesterone-primed rats than in rats receiving the vehicle. Moreover, independent of hormone condition, rats tested in the No Contact condition exhibit a stronger preference for the male than rats tested in the Contact condition, reflecting in part the active pacing of mating stimulation by sexually receptive rats tested in the Contact condition. Experiment 2 showed that the overall pattern of partner preference in proestrous and diestrous rats was similar to that observed in ovariectomized, estrogen- and progesterone-primed, and oil-treated rats, respectively. In Experiment 3, rats primed with estrogen alone did not exhibit a preference for the male even though fully receptive. Experiments 4 and 5 demonstrated that sexual experience does not affect the expression of preference for the male in estrogen- and progesterone-primed rats. The present findings demonstrate that the female rat's preference for the male is stable across repeated tests and is not affected by sexual experience. Our results also confirm that gonadal hormones influence the expression of a preference for a sexually active male versus a sexually receptive female and demonstrate that the magnitude of preference is modulated by test conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15109905     DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2003.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Behav        ISSN: 0018-506X            Impact factor:   3.587


  14 in total

1.  Use of an operant paradigm for the study of antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction.

Authors:  Lynda Uphouse; Jonathan Pinkston; Duane Baade; Christian Solano; Bless Onaiwu
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Estrogen-induced sexual incentive motivation, proceptivity and receptivity depend on a functional estrogen receptor alpha in the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus but not in the amygdala.

Authors:  Thierry Spiteri; Sergei Musatov; Sonoko Ogawa; Ana Ribeiro; Donald W Pfaff; Anders Agmo
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 4.914

3.  Prior hormonal treatment, but not sexual experience, reduces the negative effects of restraint on female sexual behavior.

Authors:  Lynda Uphouse; Cindy Hiegel; Sarah Adams; Vanessa Murillo; Monique Martinez
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The medial preoptic area is necessary for sexual odor preference, but not sexual solicitation, in female Syrian hamsters.

Authors:  Luis A Martinez; Aras Petrulis
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 5.  The neural basis of sex differences in sexual behavior: A quantitative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timm B Poeppl; Berthold Langguth; Rainer Rupprecht; Adam Safron; Danilo Bzdok; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 8.606

6.  Zaprinast, a phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor, alters paced mating behavior in female rats.

Authors:  Ann S Clark; Sarah H Meerts; Fay A Guarraci
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-10-29

7.  Female gonadal hormones, mild restraint, and male preference.

Authors:  L Uphouse; C Hiegel; J Sarkar; J Hurlburt; C Templeton; J Guptarak; N Maswood
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 8.  Pharmacology of serotonin and female sexual behavior.

Authors:  Lynda Uphouse
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  The effects of sexual experience and estrus on male-seeking motivated behavior in the female rat.

Authors:  Barbara Nofrey; Beatriz Rocha; Hassan H Lopez; Aaron Ettenberg
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-08-11

10.  Factors influencing fluoxetine-induced sexual dysfunction in female rats.

Authors:  Sarah Adams; Danyeal Heckard; James Hassell; Lynda Uphouse
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.