Literature DB >> 15109853

Cemented fixation with PMMA or Bis-GMA resin hydroxyapatite cement: effect of implant surface roughness.

W R Walsh1, M J Svehla, J Russell, M Saito, T Nakashima, R M Gillies, W Bruce, R Hori.   

Abstract

Implant surface roughness is an important parameter governing the overall mechanical properties at the implant-cement interface. This study investigated the influence of surface roughness using polymethylmethcrylate (PMMA) and a Bisphenol-a-glycidylmethacyrlate resin-hydroxyapatite cement (CAP). Mechanical fixation at the implant-cement interface was evaluated in vitro using static shear and fatigue loading with cobalt chrome alloy (CoCr) dowels with different surface roughness preparations. Increasing surface roughness improved the mechanical properties at the implant-cement interface for both types of cement. CAP cement fixation was superior to PMMA under static and dynamic loading.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15109853     DOI： 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN： 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  9 in total

1.  Development of strong and bioactive calcium phosphate cement as a light-cure organic-inorganic hybrid.

Authors:  M Barounian; S Hesaraki; A Kazemzadeh
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Free form fabricated features on CoCr implants with and without hydroxyapatite coating in vivo: a comparative study of bone contact and bone growth induction.

Authors:  Kathryn Grandfield; Anders Palmquist; Stéphane Gonçalves; Andy Taylor; Mark Taylor; Lena Emanuelsson; Peter Thomsen; Håkan Engqvist
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Fabrication of bioactive hydroxyapatite/bis-GMA based composite via three dimensional printing.

Authors:  J Suwanprateeb; R Sanngam; W Suwanpreuk
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Similar TKA designs with differences in clinical outcome: a randomized, controlled trial of 77 knees with a mean follow-up of 6 years.

Authors:  Huub J Meijerink; Nico Verdonschot; Corné J M van Loon; Gerjon Hannink; Maarten C de Waalmalefijt
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Peen treatment on a titanium implant: effect of roughness, osteoblast cell functions, and bonding with bone cement.

Authors:  Morshed Khandaker; Shahram Riahinezhad; Fariha Sultana; Melville B Vaughan; Joshua Knight; Tracy L Morris
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-02-04

6.  Microgroove and Collagen-poly(ε-caprolactone) Nanofiber Mesh Coating Improves the Mechanical Stability and Osseointegration of Titanium Implants.

Authors:  Morshed Khandaker; Shahram Riahinezhad; Wendy R Williams; Roman Wolf
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 5.076

7.  Laser-Induced Microgrooves Improve the Mechanical Responses of Cemented Implant Systems.

Authors:  Morshed Khandaker; Abdellah Ait Moussa; Desmond Nuyebga Sama; Fereshteh Safavinia; Susmita Hazra; Onur Can Kalay; Fatih Karpat; Erik Clary; Amgad Haleem
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Cement-implant interface contamination: possible reason of inferior clinical outcomes for rough surface cemented stems.

Authors:  Tian Wang; Matthew H Pelletier; Nicky Bertollo; Alan Crosky; William R Walsh
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2013-06-28

9.  Fracture toughness of titanium-cement interfaces: effects of fibers and loading angles.

Authors:  Morshed Khandaker; Khatri Chhetri Utsaha; Tracy Morris
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-04-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.