Literature DB >> 15109751

The time-varying response of the in vivo lumbar spine to dynamic repetitive flexion.

Robert J Parkinson1, Tyson A C Beach, Jack P Callaghan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the time-varying stiffness and kinematic responses of the in vivo lumbar spine exposed to dynamic repetitive flexion movements.
DESIGN: Changes in in vivo passive lumbar moment-angle relationships were monitored in response to dynamic repetitive flexion.
BACKGROUND: While previous in vitro studies have provided conflicting evidence on the effects of repetitive flexion movements on the stiffness of the lumbar spine, no previous studies have quantified the time-varying changes of the in vivo lumbar spine to dynamic repetitive flexion.
METHODS: Subjects lifted and lowered a 4.5 kg load over two barriers at a rate of 7 lifts per minute for 1.5 h inducing at least 80% of the lumbar flexion range of motion. Prior to lifting and at 30 min intervals passive moment-angle relationships were obtained by pulling the subject into flexion on a customized frictionless table.
RESULTS: Repetitive lifting induced a decreasing stiffness trend after 30 min, followed by a recovery towards initial stiffness levels with further loading. The trends were non-significant for all measures studied.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that after 30 min of lifting, creep within the passive tissues may allow workers to exceed their initial range of motion, altering joint mechanics and loading patterns potentially leading to an increased risk of developing low back pain. RELEVANCE: Given the potential for time-varying changes to alter the spine's risk of injury and injury mechanisms, knowledge regarding the stiffness response of the in vivo lumbar spine exposed to repetitive flexion may lead to improved understanding and prevention of work related back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15109751     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  6 in total

1.  The incidence of low back pain in ncaa division iii female field hockey players.

Authors:  Richard Haydt; Steven Pheasant; Kevin Lawrence
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-06

2.  Differences in symmetry of lumbar region passive tissue characteristics between people with and people without low back pain.

Authors:  Sara P Gombatto; Barbara J Norton; Sara A Scholtes; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Factors contributing to lumbar region passive tissue characteristics in people with and people without low back pain.

Authors:  Sara P Gombatto; Barbara J Norton; Shirley A Sahrmann; Michael J Strube; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Load-relaxation properties of the human trunk in response to prolonged flexion: measuring and modeling the effect of flexion angle.

Authors:  Nima Toosizadeh; Maury A Nussbaum; Babak Bazrgari; Michael L Madigan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Prolonged Intermittent Trunk Flexion Increases Trunk Muscles Reflex Gains and Trunk Stiffness.

Authors:  Matej Voglar; Jeffrey Wamerdam; Idsart Kingma; Nejc Sarabon; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Effects of Muscle Fatigue, Creep, and Musculoskeletal Pain on Neuromuscular Responses to Unexpected Perturbation of the Trunk: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jacques Abboud; Arnaud Lardon; Frédéric Boivin; Claude Dugas; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.