| Literature DB >> 15109429 |
Manuela Caniça1, Ricardo Dias, Eugénia Ferreira.
Abstract
For 1 year, serogroup, serotype, serosubtype, and penicillin susceptibility of meningococci circulating in various regions in Portugal were evaluated. Most frequent phenotypes were B:4:P1.15 (13.4%) and C:2b:P1.2,5 (75.9%), which are also common in Spain. Overall, 27.5% of C:2b:P1.2,5 strains showed intermediate resistance to penicillin. Laboratory-based surveillance of meningococcal infection in Portugal provides important information to assess the adequacy of public health measures.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15109429 PMCID: PMC3086177 DOI: 10.3201/eid1003.030357
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Distribution of 109 invasive meningococcal isolates by serogroup, serotype, serosubtype and susceptibility to penicillin
| Serogroup (no. of strains) | Serotype (no. of strains) | Serotype: subtypea | No. of strains (%) | Penicillin susceptibility | No. of strains with the same phenotype in 1995–1999b,c | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC (μg/mL) | S, IRb | ||||||
| B (n = 52) | 1 (n = 12) | 1:NST | 6 (11.6) | 0.06 | S |
| |
| 1:P1.13 | 2 (3.8) | 0.06 | S |
| |||
| 1:P1.14 | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S |
| |||
| 1:P1.15 | 1 (1.9) | 0.25 | IR |
| |||
| 1:P1.4 | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S |
| |||
| 1:P1.9 | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S |
| |||
| 2b (n = 1) | 2b:NST | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S |
| ||
| 4 (n = 16) | 4:P1.2,5 | 2 (3.8) | 0.06 | S |
| ||
|
| 1 (1.9) | 0.125 | IR |
| |||
| 4:P1.4 | 3 (5.8) | 0.06 | S |
| |||
| 4:P1.6 | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S |
| |||
| 4:P1.14 | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S | 1 (IR) | |||
| 4:P1.15 | 5 (9.6) | 0.06 | S | 1 (S) | |||
|
| 2 (3.8) | 0.125 | IR |
| |||
| 4:NST | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S |
| |||
| 14 (n = 2) | 14:NST | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S | 3 (S) | ||
| 14:P1.12 | 1 (1.9) | 0.25 | IR |
| |||
| 15 (n = 6) | 15:P1.7 | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S |
| ||
| 15:P1.7,16 | 5 (9.6) | 0.06 | S | 5 (S) | |||
| NT (n = 15) | NT:P1.2,5 | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S |
| ||
| NT:P1.6 | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S | 2 (S) | |||
| NT:P1.7,16 | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S | 1 (IR) | |||
| NT:P1.9 | 5 (9.6) | 0.06 | S | 1 (S) | |||
| NT:P1.12 | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S |
| |||
| NT:P1.15 | 2 (3.8) | 0.06 | S | 1 (S) | |||
| 1 (1.9) | 0.25 | IR |
| ||||
| NT:NST | 3 (5.8) | 0.06 | S | 1 (IR) | |||
| C (n = 54) | 2a (n = 2) | 2a:P1.2,5 | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S | 2 (S) | |
| 2a:P1.5 | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S |
| |||
| 2b (n = 48) | 2b:P1.2 | 2 (3.7) | 0.06 | S | 1 (IR) | ||
| 1 (1.9) | 0.125 | IR |
| ||||
| 1 (1.9) | 0.25 | IR |
| ||||
| 2b:P1.2,5 | 11 (20.4) | 0.06 | S | 18 (3 S, 15 IR) | |||
| 10 (18.5) | 0.125 | IR |
| ||||
| 18 (33.3) | 0.25 | IR |
| ||||
| 2 (3.7) | 0.5 | IR |
| ||||
| 2b:P1.5 | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S | 1 (IR) | |||
| 2b:NST | 1 (1.9) | 0.25 | IR | 1 (IR) | |||
| 1 (1.9) | |||||||
| 15 (n = 1) | 15:NST | 1 (1.9) | 0.5 | IR |
| ||
| 0.06 | S |
| |||||
| NT (n = 3) | NT:P1.2,5 | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S |
| ||
| NT:P1.5 | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S |
| |||
| NT:NST | 1 (1.9) | 0.06 | S |
| |||
| W135 (n = 3) | 2a (n = 3) | 2a:P1.2,5 | 2 (66.7) | 0.06 | S | 4 (3S, 1IR) | |
| 1 (33.3) | 0.125 | IR | |||||
aNT, non-serotypable; NST, non-serosubtypeable. bS, susceptible; IR, intermediate resistance. cPhenotypes that already existed in a strain collection isolated in nine Portuguese hospitals from January 1995 to December 1999 (n = 54) (8). Phenotypes present in the earlier collection not found in our study (unpub. data) are: B:2b:P1.5, B:4:P1.7, B:15:P1.9, B:15:P1.13, B:15:NST, B:NT:P1.14, B:NT:P1.16, C:2a:P1.14, C:2a:NST, C:4:P1.12; W135:NT:NST (n = 1 for each phenotype).
FigureDistribution of Neisseria meningitidis collected in Portugal from July 2000 to August 2001 and phenotype C:2b:P1.2,5.