Tony Nicholson1, Duncan Ettles, Graham Robinson. 1. Department of Vascular Radiology, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals Trust, Anlaby Road, Hull HU3 2JZ, UK. Tony.Nicholson@leedsth.nhs.uk
Abstract
PURPOSE: Approximately 200,000 central venous catheterizations are carried out annually in the National Health Service in the United Kingdom. Inadvertent arterial puncture occurs in up to 3.7%. Significant morbidity and death has been reported. We report on our experience in the endovascular treatment of this iatrogenic complication. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was carried out of 9 cases referred for endovascular treatment of inadvertent arterial puncture during central venous catheterization over a 5 year period. RESULTS: It was not possible to obtain accurate figures on the numbers of central venous catheterizations carried out during the time period. Five patients were referred with carotid or subclavian pseudoaneurysms and hemothorax following inadvertent arterial catheter insertion and subsequent removal. These patients all underwent percutaneous balloon tamponade and/or stent-graft insertion. More recently 4 patients were referred with the catheter still in situ and were successfully treated with a percutaneous closure device. CONCLUSION: If inadvertent arterial catheterization during central venous access procedures is recognized and catheters removed, sequelae can be treated percutaneously. However, once the complication is recognized it is better to leave the catheter in situ and seal the artery percutaneously with a closure device.
PURPOSE: Approximately 200,000 central venous catheterizations are carried out annually in the National Health Service in the United Kingdom. Inadvertent arterial puncture occurs in up to 3.7%. Significant morbidity and death has been reported. We report on our experience in the endovascular treatment of this iatrogenic complication. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was carried out of 9 cases referred for endovascular treatment of inadvertent arterial puncture during central venous catheterization over a 5 year period. RESULTS: It was not possible to obtain accurate figures on the numbers of central venous catheterizations carried out during the time period. Five patients were referred with carotid or subclavian pseudoaneurysms and hemothorax following inadvertent arterial catheter insertion and subsequent removal. These patients all underwent percutaneous balloon tamponade and/or stent-graft insertion. More recently 4 patients were referred with the catheter still in situ and were successfully treated with a percutaneous closure device. CONCLUSION: If inadvertent arterial catheterization during central venous access procedures is recognized and catheters removed, sequelae can be treated percutaneously. However, once the complication is recognized it is better to leave the catheter in situ and seal the artery percutaneously with a closure device.
Authors: Ji-Heui Lee; Young Bae Kim; Min Kee Lee; Jong Il Kim; Ji-Yeon Lee; So Young Lee; Eun-Ju Lee; Yong Seock Lee Journal: Korean J Anesthesiol Date: 2010-09-20
Authors: Osama A El Sharkawy; Emad K Refaat; Abdel Elmoniem M Ibraheem; Wafiya R Mahdy; Nirmeen A Fayed; Wesam S Mourad; Hanaa S Abd Elhafez; Khaled A Yassen Journal: Saudi J Anaesth Date: 2013-10