Literature DB >> 15109035

Contribution of genetic and environmental factors to variation in body compartments--a twin study in adults.

Dorin Hanisch1, Manuela Dittmar, Thomas Höhler, Kurt W Alt.   

Abstract

This study aimed at analyzing the contribution of genetic and environmental factors on phenotypic variation of various traits of body composition. Subjects were 30 same-sexed pairs of twins including 20 monozygous (MZ) and 10 dizygous (DZ) pairs, aged 19-62 years. Zygosity was determined by DNA typing and morphological diagnosis. Body composition parameters (fat mass FM, lean body mass LBM, body cell mass BCM, extracellular mass ECM, total body water TBW, extracellular water ECW, and intracellular water ICW) were estimated by tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance analysis. Potential environmental factors influencing body composition (number of children, sporting activity and smoking behaviour) were determined by questionnaires. Heritabilities for traits of body composition were calculated by use of the twin method. Intraclass correlation is > 0.80 for the variation of LBM, BCM, ECM, TBW, ECW, and ICW in both MZ and DZ twins. Estimated heritability (h2) for FM, LBM, BCM, ECW, TBW, ECW, and ICW is 65%, 77%, 79%, 83%, 76%, 68%, and 82%, respectively. The h2 values for FM and LBM are consistent with those reported in other twin studies. For BCM, ECM, ECW and ICW, no comparative h2 estimates exist. Within-pair differences in body compartments do not change with increasing age in MZ and DZ twin pairs (p > 0.05). Stepwise multiple regression analyses indicate that zygosity, age, sex, number of children, sporting level and smoking behaviour do not significantly predict within-pair differences for weight, BMI, FM, LBM, TBW, ECW and ICW (each, p > 0.05). In contrast, sex and the number of children explain together 27% of observed within-pair differences for BCM. Zygosity is the only significant predictor of within-pair differences for ECM and height, explaining 20% (p = 0.008) and 36% of variance, respectively (p < 0.0001). Results indicate that genetic factors exert stronger influences on body composition than the considered environmental traits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15109035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anthropol Anz        ISSN: 0003-5548


  6 in total

Review 1.  How nutrition and exercise maintain the human musculoskeletal mass.

Authors:  Henning Wackerhage; Michael J Rennie
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Variation in the heritability of body mass index based on diverse twin studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  J Min; D T Chiu; Y Wang
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 9.213

3.  Relationship between maternal obesity and infant feeding-interactions.

Authors:  Russell Rising; Fima Lifshitz
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Extracellular water and blood pressure in adults with growth hormone (GH) deficiency: a genotype-phenotype association study.

Authors:  Edna J L Barbosa; Camilla A M Glad; Anna G Nilsson; Niklas Bosaeus; Helena Filipsson Nyström; Per-Arne Svensson; Bengt-Åke Bengtsson; Staffan Nilsson; Ingvar Bosaeus; Cesar Luiz Boguszewski; Gudmundur Johannsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effect of Body Composition Methodology on Heritability Estimation of Body Fatness.

Authors:  Sonya J Elder; Susan B Roberts; Megan A McCrory; Sai Krupa Das; Paul J Fuss; Anastassios G Pittas; Andrew S Greenberg; Steven B Heymsfield; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Thomas J Bouchard; Edward Saltzman; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Open Nutr J       Date:  2012-04-05

6.  No Evidence for Passive Gene-Environment Correlation or the Influence of Genetic Risk for Psychiatric Disorders on Adult Body Composition via the Adoption Design.

Authors:  Avina K Hunjan; Rosa Cheesman; Jonathan R I Coleman; Christopher Hübel; Thalia C Eley; Gerome Breen
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.805

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.