Literature DB >> 15108783

The clinical outcome and quality of life following minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.

Sharif Al-Ruzzeh1, Waseem Mazrani, Jo Wray, Thomas Modine, Koki Nakamura, Shane George, Charles Ilsley, Mohamed Amrani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) through a limited anterior small thoracotomy has been shown to be a promising technique of surgical treatment for single or double vessel disease. Little is known about the Health-Related Quality Of Life (HRQOL) in this group of patients.
METHODS: The records of 75 consecutive patients who underwent MIDCAB procedure at Harefield Hospital between April 2000 and January 2002 were reviewed retrospectively. HRQOL assessment was planned in a cross-sectional design. Patients were contacted by telephone to conduct a semi-structured interview and were sent two questionnaires: the Short Form health survey (SF-36) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
RESULTS: There was no in-hospital death. Patients stayed in the Intensive Therapy Unit (ITU) for 11.56 +/- 4.55 hours and stayed in hospital for 3 +/- 2.34 days. None of the study patients had perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) or neurological complications including permanent and transient strokes. We were able to contact all the 75 patients by telephone and they also completed the SF-36 and HADS. The SF-36 scores were compared to an age-matched group of normal British people. The MIDCAB group had an excellent general health perception compared to the normal group (p < 0.001), but similar scores otherwise. The HADS scores showed that only 1 patient (1.3%) had mild depression, 5 patients (6.7%) had mild anxiety, and 2 patients (2.6%) had moderate anxiety.
CONCLUSION: MIDCAB is a safe surgical treatment and provides excellent clinical and HRQOL outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15108783     DOI: 10.1111/j.0886-0440.2004.04003.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Surg        ISSN: 0886-0440            Impact factor:   1.620


  7 in total

1.  Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus off-pump coronary surgery through sternotomy.

Authors:  R Birla; P Patel; G Aresu; G Asimakopoulos
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Mid-term clinical and health-related quality of life outcomes for the Trifecta bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Biswarup Purkayastha; Md Wasim Khan; Atanu Saha; Debasis Das; Lalit Kapoor; Mrinalendu Das; Pradeep Narayan
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-04-27

3.  Quality of life and coping following minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery.

Authors:  J Wray; S Al-Ruzzeh; W Mazrani; K Nakamura; S George; C Ilsley; M Amrani
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Quality-of-Life measures for cardiac surgery practice and research: a review and primer.

Authors:  Phillip J Tully
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2013-03

5.  Perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus off-pump coronary artery bypass with sternotomy.

Authors:  Ali İhsan Tekin; Ümit Arslan
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 1.195

6.  The Likert scale is a powerful tool for quality of life assessment among patients after minimally invasive coronary surgery.

Authors:  Łukasz J Krzych; Małgorzata Lach; Michał Joniec; Marek Cisowski; Andrzej Bochenek
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2018-06-25

Review 7.  Minimally Invasive Coronary Revascularisation Surgery: A Focused Review of the Available Literature.

Authors:  Karel M Van Praet; Markus Kofler; Timo Z Nazari Shafti; Alaa Abd El Al; Antonia van Kampen; Andrea Amabile; Gianluca Torregrossa; Jörg Kempfert; Volkmar Falk; Husam H Balkhy; Stephan Jacobs
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.