Literature DB >> 15108749

Patient co-payments and use of prescription medicines.

Evan Doran1, Jane Robertson, Isobel Rolfe, David Henry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how prescription co-payments influence the medicine use of Australian patients.
METHODS: Two surveys and an in-depth interview study were conducted in the Newcastle/Hunter region of New South Wales (NSW). A community-based survey explored how often prescription cost posed a barrier to prescription use. A general practice patient survey investigated the impact of prescription cost on the timing of medical consultations and prescription collection. Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics; associations between household characteristics and outcomes were explored using odds ratios and chi square analysis. In-depth interviews were conducted to explore the role of prescription cost in medicine use. The interview data were qualitatively analysed for relevant themes using 'grounded theory'.
RESULTS: 420 of 950 households (44%) participated in the community survey: 110 (26%) reported delaying visiting a GP, 85 (20%) not buying all of their prescription medicines and 77 (18%) not refilling a prescription because of cost. Sixty-two (15%) households reported significant difficulties with prescription costs. Households with children had twice the odds of reporting significant difficulties than those without (OR= 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.5). Of the 442 (43%) GP patients who participated, 25 (6%) patients reported prescription cost as the reason for delaying their visit. Of the 291 patients who received a prescription, 26 (9%) patients reported cost as the reason for not collecting some or all of their prescriptions. IMPLICATIONS: Given the wide variation in patients' capacity to manage increased out-of-pocket costs, co-payments may add to patients' burden and place a potential barrier to safe and timely prescription use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15108749     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2004.tb00634.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  5 in total

1.  Prescription medicines: decision-making preferences of patients who receive different levels of public subsidy.

Authors:  Jane Robertson; Evan Doran; David A Henry; Glenn Salkeld
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Financial and family burden associated with cancer treatment in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Christopher J Longo; Margaret Fitch; Raisa B Deber; A Paul Williams
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 3.359

3.  Health systems and sustainability: doctors and consumers differ on threats and solutions.

Authors:  Jane Robertson; Emily J Walkom; David A Henry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Costs of medicines and health care: a concern for Australian women across the ages.

Authors:  Emily J Walkom; Deborah Loxton; Jane Robertson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Is 50 cent the price of the optimal copayment? - a qualitative study of patient opinions and attitudes in response to a 50 cent charge on prescription drugs in a publicly funded health system in Ireland.

Authors:  Sarah-Jo Sinnott; Marie Guinane; Helen Whelton; Stephen Byrne
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.