BACKGROUND: The sex differential in coronary heart disease (CHD) risk, which is not explained by male/female differences in lipid and lipoprotein concentrations, narrows with age. We examined whether this differential CHD risk might, in part, be attributable to the sizes of lipoprotein particles or concentrations of lipoprotein subclasses. METHODS: We analyzed frozen plasma samples from 1574 men and 1692 women from exam cycle 4 (1988-1990) of the Framingham Offspring Study. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was used to determine the subclass concentrations and mean sizes of VLDL, LDL, and HDL particles. Concentrations of lipids and apolipoproteins were measured by standard chemical methods. RESULTS: In addition to the expected sex differences in concentrations of triglycerides, LDL-cholesterol, and HDL-cholesterol, women also had a lower-risk subclass profile consisting of larger LDL (0.4 nm) and HDL (0.5 nm) particles. The sex difference was most pronounced for HDL, with women having a twofold higher (8 vs 4 micromol/L) concentration of large HDL particles than men. Furthermore, similar to the narrowing of the sex difference in CHD risk with age, the observed male/female difference in HDL particle size also decreased with age. Although lipoprotein particle sizes were highly correlated with lipid and lipoprotein concentrations, the sex differences in the mean sizes of lipoprotein particles persisted (P <0.001) even after adjustment for lipid and lipoprotein concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Women have a less atherogenic subclass profile than men, even after accounting for differences in lipid concentrations.
BACKGROUND: The sex differential in coronary heart disease (CHD) risk, which is not explained by male/female differences in lipid and lipoprotein concentrations, narrows with age. We examined whether this differential CHD risk might, in part, be attributable to the sizes of lipoprotein particles or concentrations of lipoprotein subclasses. METHODS: We analyzed frozen plasma samples from 1574 men and 1692 women from exam cycle 4 (1988-1990) of the Framingham Offspring Study. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was used to determine the subclass concentrations and mean sizes of VLDL, LDL, and HDL particles. Concentrations of lipids and apolipoproteins were measured by standard chemical methods. RESULTS: In addition to the expected sex differences in concentrations of triglycerides, LDL-cholesterol, and HDL-cholesterol, women also had a lower-risk subclass profile consisting of larger LDL (0.4 nm) and HDL (0.5 nm) particles. The sex difference was most pronounced for HDL, with women having a twofold higher (8 vs 4 micromol/L) concentration of large HDL particles than men. Furthermore, similar to the narrowing of the sex difference in CHD risk with age, the observed male/female difference in HDL particle size also decreased with age. Although lipoprotein particle sizes were highly correlated with lipid and lipoprotein concentrations, the sex differences in the mean sizes of lipoprotein particles persisted (P <0.001) even after adjustment for lipid and lipoprotein concentrations. CONCLUSIONS:Women have a less atherogenic subclass profile than men, even after accounting for differences in lipid concentrations.
Authors: Daniela Baumstark; Werner Kremer; Alfred Boettcher; Christina Schreier; Paul Sander; Gerd Schmitz; Renate Kirchhoefer; Fritz Huber; Hans Robert Kalbitzer Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Shannon L Klingel; Kaitlin Roke; Bertha Hidalgo; Stella Aslibekyan; Robert J Straka; Ping An; Michael A Province; Paul N Hopkins; Donna K Arnett; Jose M Ordovas; Chao-Qiang Lai; David M Mutch Journal: Lipids Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 1.880
Authors: Nobutaka Hirooka; Chol Shin; Kamal H Masaki; Daniel Edmundowicz; Jina Choo; Emma J M Barinas-Mitchell; Bradley J Willcox; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Aiman El-Saed; Iva Miljkovic-Gacic; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Katsuyuki Miura; Hirotsugu Ueshima; Lewis H Kuller; Akira Sekikawa Journal: Glob Heart Date: 2013-09-01
Authors: Jacquelyn A Hatch-Stein; Andrea Kelly; Samuel S Gidding; Babette S Zemel; Sheela N Magge Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 4.766
Authors: Karen A Matthews; Sybil L Crawford; Claudia U Chae; Susan A Everson-Rose; Mary Fran Sowers; Barbara Sternfeld; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Noha H Farag; William E Moore; David M Thompson; Cee E Kobza; Kathryn Abbott; June E Eichner Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-06-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Andrew C Edmondson; Robert J Brown; Sekar Kathiresan; L Adrienne Cupples; Serkalem Demissie; Alisa Knodle Manning; Majken K Jensen; Eric B Rimm; Jian Wang; Amrith Rodrigues; Vaneeta Bamba; Sumeet A Khetarpal; Megan L Wolfe; Stephanie Derohannessian; Mingyao Li; Muredach P Reilly; Jens Aberle; David Evans; Robert A Hegele; Daniel J Rader Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2009-03-16 Impact factor: 14.808