Literature DB >> 15107193

No evidence of the usefulness of eye blinking as a marker for central dopaminergic activity.

J van der Post1, P P de Waal, M L de Kam, A F Cohen, J M A van Gerven.   

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate eye blinking as a marker for central dopaminergic activity by investigating the effects of sulpiride (D2-antagonist) and lisuride (D2-agonist) on spontaneous eye blinks. Twelve healthy subjects were included in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-period crossover trial. They received sulpiride 400 mg, lisuride 0.2 mg and placebo on different occasions. Eye blinks, prolactin, finger tapping, eye movements and visual analogue scales were measured at baseline and regularly for 12 h after administration. No effect of sulpiride or lisuride was observed on the number of eye blinks. Sulpiride caused an increase in prolactin (643 U/ml) [confidence interval (CI) 549-737). Lisuride caused a decrease in smooth pursuit eye movements (-4.1%) (CI -7.3 to -0.9) and visual analogue scales for mood (-2.1 mm) (CI -3.7 to -0.4). Spontaneous eye blink rate was not affected by sulpiride and lisuride, which makes eye blinking not suitable as a marker for central D2 activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15107193     DOI: 10.1177/0269881104042832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0269-8811            Impact factor:   4.153


  12 in total

1.  Factors regulating eye blink rate in young infants.

Authors:  Leigh F Bacher
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data to be derived from early-phase drug development: designing informative human pharmacology studies.

Authors:  Adam Cohen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Spontaneous Eye-Blink Rate as an Index of Reward Responsivity: Validation and Links to Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Andrew D Peckham; Sheri L Johnson
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-09-03

4.  The dopamine augmenter L-DOPA does not affect positive mood in healthy human volunteers.

Authors:  John Liggins; Robert O Pihl; Chawki Benkelfat; Marco Leyton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Eye-blinks in choice response tasks uncover hidden aspects of information processing.

Authors:  Edmund Wascher; Holger Heppner; Tina Möckel; Sven Oliver Kobald; Stephan Getzmann
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.068

6.  Spontaneous Eye Blink Rate (EBR) Is Uncorrelated with Dopamine D2 Receptor Availability and Unmodulated by Dopamine Agonism in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Linh C Dang; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Jaime J Castrellon; Scott F Perkins; Ronald L Cowan; Paul A Newhouse; David H Zald
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-09-18

7.  Spontaneous eye blink rate and dopamine synthesis capacity: preliminary evidence for an absence of positive correlation.

Authors:  Guillaume Sescousse; Romain Ligneul; Ruth J van Holst; Lieneke K Janssen; Femke de Boer; Marcel Janssen; Anne S Berry; William J Jagust; Roshan Cools
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Reduced spontaneous eye blink rates in recreational cocaine users: evidence for dopaminergic hypoactivity.

Authors:  Lorenza S Colzato; Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reduced attentional scope in cocaine polydrug users.

Authors:  Lorenza S Colzato; Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Physiological Measures of Dopaminergic and Noradrenergic Activity During Attentional Set Shifting and Reversal.

Authors:  Péter Pajkossy; Ágnes Szőllősi; Gyula Demeter; Mihály Racsmány
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.