Karen Mattick1, Ian Dennis, John Bligh. 1. Institute of Clinical Education, Peninsula Medical School, Plymouth UK. karen.mattick@pms.ac.uk
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Inventories to quantify approaches to studying try to determine how students approach academic tasks. Medical curricula usually aim to promote a deep approach to studying, which is associated with academic success and which may predict desirable traits postqualification. AIMS: This study aimed to validate a revised Approaches to Learning and Studying Inventory (ALSI) in medical students and to explore its relation to student characteristics and performance. METHODS: Confirmatory factor analysis was used to validate the reported constructs in a sample of 128 Year 1 medical students. Models were developed to investigate the effect of age, graduate status and gender, and the relationships between approaches to studying and assessment outcomes. RESULTS: The ALSI performed as anticipated in this population, thus validating its use in our sample, but a 4-factor solution had a better fit than the reported 5-factor one. Medical students scored highly on deep approach compared with other students in higher education. Graduate status and gender had significant effects on approach to studying and a deep approach was associated with higher academic scores. CONCLUSIONS: The ALSI is valid for use in medical students and can uncover interesting relationships between approaches to studying and student characteristics. In addition, the ALSI has potential as a tool to predict student success, both academically and beyond qualification.
INTRODUCTION: Inventories to quantify approaches to studying try to determine how students approach academic tasks. Medical curricula usually aim to promote a deep approach to studying, which is associated with academic success and which may predict desirable traits postqualification. AIMS: This study aimed to validate a revised Approaches to Learning and Studying Inventory (ALSI) in medical students and to explore its relation to student characteristics and performance. METHODS: Confirmatory factor analysis was used to validate the reported constructs in a sample of 128 Year 1 medical students. Models were developed to investigate the effect of age, graduate status and gender, and the relationships between approaches to studying and assessment outcomes. RESULTS: The ALSI performed as anticipated in this population, thus validating its use in our sample, but a 4-factor solution had a better fit than the reported 5-factor one. Medical students scored highly on deep approach compared with other students in higher education. Graduate status and gender had significant effects on approach to studying and a deep approach was associated with higher academic scores. CONCLUSIONS: The ALSI is valid for use in medical students and can uncover interesting relationships between approaches to studying and student characteristics. In addition, the ALSI has potential as a tool to predict student success, both academically and beyond qualification.
Authors: Alexander Jobs; Christoph Twesten; Anna Göbel; Hendrik Bonnemeier; Hendrik Lehnert; Gunther Weitz Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Jennifer L Eastwood; Elysa Koppelman-White; Misa Mi; Jason Adam Wasserman; Ernest F Krug Iii; Barbara Joyce Journal: Int J Med Educ Date: 2017-01-07
Authors: Myriam Gharbi; Luke S P Moore; Enrique Castro-Sánchez; Elpiniki Spanoudaki; Charlotte Grady; Alison H Holmes; Lydia N Drumright Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 3.090