Literature DB >> 15106358

Validation of OSIRIS, a prescreening tool for the identification of women with an increased risk of osteoporosis.

J Y Reginster1, W Ben Sedrine, P Viethel, M C Micheletti, T Chevallier, M Audran.   

Abstract

According to the recent recommendations of the European Community and the World Health Organization, identification of risk factors for fracture or low bone mineral density (BMD) should help health professionals to make a better use of bone densitometry. This includes helping patients to modify their behaviour and act on modifiable risk factors (correction of low calcium intake and vitamin D deficiencies, etc.) and also to provide evidence-based guidance for starting a treatment when necessary. In this context, we previously developed a clinical scoring index, OSIRIS (OSteoporosis Index of RISk), for classifying women into three categories of risk of osteoporosis. In order to evaluate the discriminatory performance of OSIRIS, we performed the present prospective study in a sample of 889 postmenopausal women from France. The osteoporosis risk depends on the OSIRIS category. Thus, 62% of women in the 'high-risk' category (OSIRIS < or = -3) were osteoporotic, compared to 34% of women in the 'intermediate-risk' category (OSIRIS ranged between -3 and +1) and only 16.8% of women in the 'low-risk' category (score OSIRIS > 1). These results might contribute to the development of more efficient screening strategies for osteoporosis. The patients in the low-risk category do not require immediate BMD testing; women with 'intermediate risk' have to be carefully followed by their doctor with BMD testing decided on a case-by-case basis; for those within the high-risk category, treatment may be initiated immediately and BMD testing performed either to assess the efficacy of the treatment or to increase the long-term compliance of the patient. In conclusion, for clinical practice, a user-friendly tool has been developed. This tool, called OSIRIS, as far as a simple rule allows, identifies the level of osteoporosis risk in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15106358     DOI: 10.1080/09513590310001651713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0951-3590            Impact factor:   2.260


  6 in total

Review 1.  Prescreening tools to determine who needs DXA.

Authors:  Elliott N Schwartz; Dee M Steinberg
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of clinical risk assessment instruments for screening for osteoporosis or low bone density.

Authors:  S Nayak; D L Edwards; A A Saleh; S L Greenspan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Comparison of questionnaire and quantitative ultrasound techniques as screening tools for DXA.

Authors:  R B Cook; D Collins; J Tucker; P Zioupos
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Estimating regional bone mineral density-based T-scores using clinical information; tools validated for postmenopausal women in Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Hewa Walpola Amila Sewwandi Subasinghe; Sarath Lekamwasam; Patrick Ball; Hana Morrissey; Eisha Waidyaratne
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2020-09-16

5.  Validation of the Dutch guidelines for dual X-ray absorptiometry measurement.

Authors:  Noortje A Verdijk; Arnold C Romeijnders; Jos J Ruskus; Corien van der Sluijs; Victor J Pop
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Osteoporosis and its perspective in Pakistan: A review of evidence and issues for addressing fragility fractures.

Authors:  Aysha Habib Khan; Lena Jafri; Sibtain Ahmed; Shahryar Noordin
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-03-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.