OBJECTIVE: To obtain detailed information about the current geographical distribution and incidence of tick bites and Lyme borreliosis in the Netherlands and to identify regional differences in the ecological risk factors that might be involved. DESIGN: Retrospective questionnaire study. SETTING: All Dutch general practitioner's (GP) practices. METHODS: In April 2002, all GPs in the Netherlands were asked to complete a short questionnaire on the number of cases of tick bites and erythema migrans seen in 2001 and the size of their practice. Associations with possible risk factors were determined at the municipal level. Results were compared with the results of a similar study done in 1995. RESULTS: The response of the GPs was 64.5% (4730/7330). Together, all GPs reported seeing approximately 61,000 patients in 2001 with tick bites and 12,000 patients with erythema migrans. The incidence of erythema migrans was estimated at 73 per 100,000 inhabitants. There were obvious risk areas. At the municipal level, tick bites and erythema migrans were positively associated with the area covered by forest, sandy soil, the number of roe deer and tourism. There was a negative association with the degree of urbanisation. Increases in tourism in areas with many ticks, new forests in urban regions and an increased number of horses were positively associated with the increase in tick bites and erythema migrans since 1994. CONCLUSION: The number of patients with tick bites and erythema migrans seen by GPs in the Netherlands had doubled between 1994 and 2001. This increase may be attributed partly to changes in ecological risk factors and human behaviour. The number of cases of Lyme borreliosis may be reduced by giving prophylactic information annually about ticks and ways to remove them, plus additional education of patients about the recognition of erythema migrans.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain detailed information about the current geographical distribution and incidence of tick bites and Lyme borreliosis in the Netherlands and to identify regional differences in the ecological risk factors that might be involved. DESIGN: Retrospective questionnaire study. SETTING: All Dutch general practitioner's (GP) practices. METHODS: In April 2002, all GPs in the Netherlands were asked to complete a short questionnaire on the number of cases of tick bites and erythema migrans seen in 2001 and the size of their practice. Associations with possible risk factors were determined at the municipal level. Results were compared with the results of a similar study done in 1995. RESULTS: The response of the GPs was 64.5% (4730/7330). Together, all GPs reported seeing approximately 61,000 patients in 2001 with tick bites and 12,000 patients with erythema migrans. The incidence of erythema migrans was estimated at 73 per 100,000 inhabitants. There were obvious risk areas. At the municipal level, tick bites and erythema migrans were positively associated with the area covered by forest, sandy soil, the number of roe deer and tourism. There was a negative association with the degree of urbanisation. Increases in tourism in areas with many ticks, new forests in urban regions and an increased number of horses were positively associated with the increase in tick bites and erythema migrans since 1994. CONCLUSION: The number of patients with tick bites and erythema migrans seen by GPs in the Netherlands had doubled between 1994 and 2001. This increase may be attributed partly to changes in ecological risk factors and human behaviour. The number of cases of Lyme borreliosis may be reduced by giving prophylactic information annually about ticks and ways to remove them, plus additional education of patients about the recognition of erythema migrans.
Authors: Peter R Wielinga; Cor Gaasenbeek; Manoj Fonville; Albert de Boer; Ankje de Vries; Wim Dimmers; Gerard Akkerhuis Op Jagers; Leo M Schouls; Fred Borgsteede; Joke W B van der Giessen Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2006-10-06 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: S Newitt; A J Elliot; R Morbey; H Durnall; M E Pietzsch; J M Medlock; S Leach; G E Smith Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 4.434
Authors: Agnetha Hofhuis; Margriet Harms; Sita Bennema; Cees C van den Wijngaard; Wilfrid van Pelt Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2015-03-15 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Cees C van den Wijngaard; Agnetha Hofhuis; Mariana Simões; Ente Rood; Wilfrid van Pelt; Herve Zeller; Wim Van Bortel Journal: Euro Surveill Date: 2017-07-06
Authors: T van Gorkom; S U C Sankatsing; W Voet; D M Ismail; R H Muilwijk; M Salomons; B J M Vlaminckx; A W J Bossink; D W Notermans; J J M Bouwman; K Kremer; S F T Thijsen Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Hein Sprong; Peter R Wielinga; Manoj Fonville; Chantal Reusken; Afke H Brandenburg; Fred Borgsteede; Cor Gaasenbeek; Joke Wb van der Giessen Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2009-09-04 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Agnetha Hofhuis; Sita Bennema; Margriet Harms; Arnold J H van Vliet; Willem Takken; Cees C van den Wijngaard; Wilfrid van Pelt Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 3.295