Literature DB >> 15106300

Polio control after certification: major issues outstanding.

Paul E M Fine1, George Oblapenko, Roland W Sutter.   

Abstract

Now that the global eradication of wild poliovirus is almost within sight, planning for the post-certification era is becoming a priority issue. It is agreed that a stockpile of appropriate polio vaccines will need to be established, and a surveillance and response capacity will need to be maintained, in order to protect the world against any possible future outbreaks attributable either to the persistence of wild poliovirus or vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPVs) or to the unintentional or intentional release of poliovirus from a laboratory or vaccine store. Although it has been suggested that the stockpile should consist of monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine (mOPV), many questions remain concerning its nature, financing, management, and use--in particular, because of uncertainties over future national vaccination policies, and over the availability of different vaccines, after the certification of wild poliovirus eradication. There are further uncertainties concerning the possible role and efficacy of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) used either routinely or in outbreak control in low-hygiene settings, the potential for rapid geographical spread of polioviruses should an outbreak occur after certification, and the risks inherent in introducing additional oral polio vaccine (OPV) viruses into populations in which the vaccine coverage and prevalence of immunity have declined, and which may thus favour the spread of VDPVs. Given these important gaps in knowledge, no country should discontinue polio vaccination until a coordinated policy for the post-certification era has been developed and the recommended measures have been put in place.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15106300      PMCID: PMC2585872     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  6 in total

1.  Effect of formaldehyde inactivation on poliovirus.

Authors:  Thomas Wilton; Glynis Dunn; David Eastwood; Philip D Minor; Javier Martin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  From emergence to eradication: the epidemiology of poliomyelitis deconstructed.

Authors:  Neal Nathanson; Olen M Kew
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Towards an effective poliovirus laboratory containment strategy in Nigeria.

Authors:  Johnson Muluh Ticha; Kolawole Olatunji Matthew; Abdullahi Walla Hamisu; Braka Fiona; Pascal Mkanda; Peter Nsubuga; Eberto Tesfaye; Kehinde Craig; Etsano Andrew; Obi Emelife; Faisal Shuaib; Akinkugbe Folasade; Johnson Adeniji; Usman Adamu; Mohammed Dallatu; Geoffrey Oyeyinka; Holly Brown; Nwakasik Nnamah; Joseph Okwori; Chukwuike Chinedu; Ibikunle Anibijuwon; Adewumi Olubusuyi; Donbraye Emmanuel; Murtala Bagana; Marycelin Baba; Gumede Nicksy; Richard Banda; Sisay G Tegegne; Ajiboye Oyetunji; Ousmane Diop; O Tomori; Rui G Vaz
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Serological survey on immunity status against polioviruses in children and adolescents living in a border region, Apulia (Southern Italy).

Authors:  Silvio Tafuri; Rosa Prato; Domenico Martinelli; Agata Calvario; Anna Bozzi; Michele Labianca; Annamaria Patti; Pietro Luigi Lopalco; Cinzia Germinario
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Estimating the extent of vaccine-derived poliovirus infection.

Authors:  Alison Wringe; Paul E M Fine; Roland W Sutter; Olen M Kew
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Dangerous pathogens in the laboratory: from smallpox to today's SARS setbacks and tomorrow's polio-free world.

Authors:  David L Heymann; R Bruce Aylward; Christopher Wolff
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 79.321

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.